russs
About
- Username
- russs
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 115
Reactions
Comments
-
Go for it! I've got a B&W Mac with an XLR8 G4 500 in it. There is no problem running OS X.
-
[quote] I also wish that when you clicked the address bar it would highlight the whole address so you can type a new one without either triple clicking or backspacing to erase the old address before enter the new one. This make sense? It does.…
-
Try this: In IE Preferences/Web Browser/Browser Display uncheck Use Address AutoComplete under Toolbar Settings. That should do it. Russ
-
Quicksilver 933MHz, GeForce 4 Ti 4600. [code] Results\t113.77\t \tSystem Info\t\t \t\tXbench Version\t\t1.0b3 \t\tSystem Version\t\t10.2.3 \t\tPhysical RAM\t\t1280 MB \t\tProcessor\t\tPowerPC,G4@0 [934 MHz] \t\t\tL1 Cache\t\t32K (instructio…
-
Here's another you might want to try.
-
This might help explain MP3 ripping speeds in iTunes. According to the Pioneer web site for the DV-105: [quote]Read speeds up to 6X for DVD (single layer), 24X for CD-R/RW and 16X for CD-Audio Extraction I recently replaced my DV-104 with the…
-
Here's the previously posted Xbench results followed by the new results after updating to 10.2.3: OS X 10.2.2 [code] Quartz Graphics Test\t119.69\t \t\tLine\t125.91\t3.21 Klines/sec [50% alpha] \t\tRectangle\t119.22\t8.39 Krects/sec [50% alp…
-
[quote] frank_t: wrote: RussS try runing quake 3 in os 9 with that card it should be faster....i Have a new Dual 867Mhz and it comes with the GF4 MX. But it's not the hardware that is the problem here it's software...you see in os x there are …
-
Ti Fighter: [quote]Do you think the Ti is getting limited some how by osx or the hardware. Cuz it really should blow the MX away. I'm guessing the hardware is limiting the performance somewhat, but that doesn't explain how the Ti 4600 could be slo…
-
I upgraded the 4MX in my 933 to The Ti 4600 and frankly for the price I don't think it was worth it. Check out the results below from Xbench's graphic tests. As you can see the 4MX was not only able to keep up with the Ti 4600, but in some of the te…
-
Well I guess I don't understand then. How does 190Kps on the Mac vs 128Kps on the PC translate to the Mac is slower? I do know that my PC does appear to be downloding faster than my Mac, but in the end they both seem to be averaging around 8 megs…
-
Well it's kinda hard to forget about the numbers. If you have Cable or DSL that 1.5M broadband connection is actually 1.5Mb (1.5 megabits per second. If you were getting 1Mbps with the PC that would translate to around 128Kps. If you're getting 1…
-
Eugene, I absolutely, 100% agree with you about Other World Computing. I buy all my memory from them. Strangely though they don't show the new iMac in their memory listings (Probably because it's not out yet), but they should realize that alot of …
-
Whoa there starfleetx! :eek: The new iMacs use 144 pin SO-DIMMS. Going somewhere like Crucial.com is a good idea though. 512MB is only $216 from Crucial compared to over $400 for the same thing from Kingston.
-
At the beginning of this topic Scott H. asked: [quote]Is it just me or do these benchmarks suck. I'm guessing it's not the GF4s fault. Well, as far as I'm concerned there is nothing wrong with those benchmarks. See the revised chart below. I…