sierradragon
About
- Username
- sierradragon
- Joined
- Visits
- 1
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 17
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TalkingNewMedia submitted my iPhone app back in April of last year and when it came time to submit screenshots these were the specs listed. I believe those may have been recommended specs before but are now mandato…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ConradJoe Is Apple's optical connector IEC 60958 type II? If so, why not just use a cheaper, but just as good, coax copper wires? Because coax copper is not just as good. One builds a new connector for the future, …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Ronbo You have an intel Mac and you're still running 10.4?? Many folks like me (9 Macs) still run 10.4.11 when possible under the premise of if it ain't broke don't fix it. Users of demanding mission-critical apps o…
-
Hopefully Apple will (finally) again make a small sized Macbook Pro available. Then folks with high-end needs perhaps just need to stop wanting to use lowest-end boxes.
-
The only thing "high end" about the MBA is the price. Performance-wise it is a LOW END box for low end usages. Of course the high price is limiting to sales. This fits with Apple's public model of building expensive 1G then evolve to 2G at lower pri…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by RolandG IMO, the MacBook's and the MacBook Pro's design is near perfect. Sleek, no unnecessary fuss, quality materials, clever details. What do you think could be optimized? Agreed, the existing MBP design is quite …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Booga I said 5x-- that's the number Adobe is quoting. You're talking 10s on Windows and a minute on the Mac. Or a minute on Windows and 5 minutes on the Mac. It might not cause people to shift en-masse, but if you…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by melgross ...The latest version is actually pretty good, to the point that the basic conversion is pretty much equal to, though somewhat different than, the one in ACR, or other pro converters... RAW conversion proba…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by trenbrac No photography forum, especially the Aperture one, shows a true representation of pro photographers. Using the habits of a handful of posters who make up the majority on a single forum is no way to state a con…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by melgross You don't know my experience, as you've just arrived here. I've been using aperture since the first day it was released, as others here are aware. Relax, like I said no disrespect is intended and I was cast…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by trenbrac That's a figure that only pertains to certain categories of professional photographers, and certainly not most of those I know. If you amend that to "Some" pro photographers you'd have something. Even i…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by melgross I'll amen that to say what I actually meant, what most here understood it to mean.. "Those of us with considerable commercial experience..." Sorry, I do not understand. By any measure I have "considerable …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by JeffDM Why recommend a book for an outdated product? Sorry, I was just trying to save verbiage by not repeating the full text of what I already said about v2.1 a few posts earlier: --------------------------- I st…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by melgross You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but it isn't shared by most pros. Folks with PCs or with lame Macs (i.e. most of the world) can not properly even trial Aperture. Even less folks have extensive ex…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jlandd ...I've done the lift stamping a thousand times in the past six months : ) and my complaint is that it's just a drag. If I have a load of images all made from the same continuous shot, and I later decid…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jlandd "pro photogs typically find that 98+% of images are fully dealt with inside Aperture. " I see this occasionally and it's simply far from my experience. With all due respect, what pro photographers are you s…
-
As an Adobe user for more than a decade I started out with a bias in favor of Adobe. I have professionally used both Aperture and Adobe's Lightroom extensively. Agreed, moreso than Photoshop, Aperture requires strong MacIntel (or a loaded multiproc…