machead99
About
- Username
- machead99
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 63
Reactions
Comments
-
It's gonna take impressive specs on the 9400M and the ability for it to assist the 9600M GT to redeem this update from the jaws of mediocrity spec wise.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Ireland What websites? Engadget, John Grubber and now AppleInsider are saying the combination of the 9400M and 9600M GT will somehow result in better graphics performance than just a 9600M GT.
-
Websites keep telling keep telling me keep telling me that the MBP is going to be some graphical beast, but unless the 9400M can actually SLI with the 9600M GT this is complete BS. If the 9400M can SLI with the 9600M GT via. GeForce Boost however…
-
Did anyone see what engagdet updated with?! Quote: Update: Our source just hit us with another pic, this time from the side -- it's after the break. We're also told that there's not one, but two NVIDIA GPUs inside -- we're guessing an integrated…
-
How much difference do Nvidia chipsets really make to gaming anyway? Are we realllly talking more than 2 or 3 fps here?
-
Quote: 15-inch MacBook Pro: 2.8GHz - 2.8GHz Core 2 Duo - 4GB RAM - 512MB GeForce 9650M GT video - 320GB hard drive - Superdrive -$2399 I'd bite. But throw in a superdrive.
-
Why would Apple use a 9600M GT when they could use a 9650M GT which is much faster and 55nm?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by FuturePastNow The 9600M GT is probably what Apple will put in the Macbook Pro. It's not a great GPU, though. It's really just a die shrunk, overclocked 8600, and bears absolutely no relation to the much more powerful d…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by wheelhot 9650m is better then 9600? Isn't that suppose to be the other way round? 9600 is the successor of 8600 btw. 9650m gt >> 9650m gs >>>>>>>> 9600m gt
-
Ah man.. if they only put a 9600M GT in the MacBook Pro.. I might actually switch to PC That card is already out of date 9650M GS at LEAST, I mean come on! Why would they put a 9600M GT in over a 9650M GT which is far far more powerful and yet…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Michael Wisniewski Having said that, do you think Apple can leap frog, beat, or at least equal the specs on IBM's upper end offering? IBM Lenovo W700 (Yeah, I think it only comes in black) No, sorry, it won't be hal…
-
If this half: and this half: Are fixed on top of each other, the chassis of the MBP (minus the screen) will be the width of what we can see in the top image, and the curved base we can see in the second image, combined. Wouldn't this mean th…
-
it's getting to the point where they're letting customers down now, it plays havoc with people's budgeting when they have literally zero idea what is around the corner and when, at the very least they could have started an online countdown if they'r…
-
Can someone give me their predicted specs for the MacBook Pros included ram, hdd, gpu and processors?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by applebook I'm sick of the crying and whining about graphics chips when most MacBook buyers don't even need something as slow as the X3100. Why would anyone want to play serious games or do serious graphics work on a Ma…
-
Why is there a Photoshop rounded rectangle around the map? Is that supposed to be the edge of the invitation? Why isn't it casting a shadow? Fake. EDIT: Also I can see that you've edited out the artifacts that were around the Apple logo on…
-
Both sides please
-
That's the most unconvincing "scan" I have ever seen in my life. Take a photo of it on the table and maybe I'll believe you, but right now, that is the single least believable invitation I have ever seen posted in Apple history.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Soulcrux Well, I see and understand the fact that the new MBPs and MBs will have a redesigned casing and will also have different chipsets. I'm going to get a Macbook Pro soon (could definitely get it within 2 weeks) a…
-
That looks really, really awesome.