lightwaver67
About
- Username
- lightwaver67
- Joined
- Visits
- 1
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 7
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 43
Reactions
Comments
-
fastasleep said: Get SwitchResX or the like. THANK YOU! I had never heard of this, and is well-worth the $16.
-
Sadly, macOS 12.2 obliterated a previously-used screen resolution. My LG 5K display has been running at 3840 x 1620 for over a year now. It's the perfect balance of readability and fitting what I need on screen. As soon as my computer rebooted from …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Alex London They co-exist. On my computer.Oh happy days! Pro X is making me beam at the moment. Only downside is no 32 Bit bridge so plugs like Sylenth won't run but that's the fault of myopic developers, n…
-
Dumb question: BEFORE I purchase and install... to those who have already done-so... Does this Logic Studio X application *OVERWRITE* Logic 9... or do the two co-exist...? I want to be sure I can still open my old projects using the 32-bit…
-
"In it, the senator said the application could aid criminals or underage teens in deceiving people." Using that logic, Photoshop and color printers should be illegal as well.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TenoBell Remember when the iPhone first came out. People complained about what it could not do. Did Apple scramble to add those features simply because people complained. Or has Apple been systematically and methodical…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TenoBell I feel like my statement is saying that I don't make assumptions based on what I want. I'm living in the reality of what exists. You are right - you will do better at training your dog to live in its own reali…
-
LOVE IT...!!!! Even the writers on Conan's show are irritated with it: http://youtu.be/sRzLP0FJ82I Awesome.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TenoBell Apple showed FCP X and its feature set at NAB. If you had done thorough research at the very least you would have seen that Apple did not list the features that you wish were there. Nowhere did Apple list any …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TenoBell I can understand what you are saying. But can you fully blame this on Apple's marketing. Or your rushing to buy it before you fully researched and understood what you were purchasing? YES! That's my poi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TenoBell Its 64bit and uses a completely different UI and file structure. Underneath the hood FCP X has virtually no relation at all to classic FCP. That is why it is a version 1 software. Again, just to be clear. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum Are you talking about a drop shadow on a title? If so, you can do that in the Inspector. If not, I think you can probably find what you want in the new Motion. AFAIK, much of the titling/effects s…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TenoBell FCP X uses an entirely different file and management system than the original FCP. That is the reason it cannot open XML files. Apple has stated that they will provide a bridge between XML and FCP X files. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by zoetmb Could anyone write a fair review of a new version of Photoshop after only one day of use? I think if you launched Photoshop CS6 and within minutes realized they omitted the marquis tool or Levels/Curves... yo…
-
I'm also amazed at the persistence of some to consider this "whining" just because THEY are not upset about the current omissions and problems. I totally understand that we can all go work in FCP7 (and I will) and that the app will improve over t…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Hummerp This ranting reminds me of that release. "OMG I can't believe it doesn't do this" "OMG I can't believe it doesn't do that". Like many others have said: It's V 1.0 Calm down and keep using what you're using unt…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by boeyc15 Im not an editor at all...so... just my opinion.... but have been reading with interest the blogs reviews etc. Have to say... it does appear that Apple left out of initial release half dozen or so 'basic' high…
-
Aperture and FCP are two different beasts... I can forgive Aperture's lack of features (initially) because it WAS starting from no-other previous version. It had to start somewhere. And yes, it has gotten pretty good over time... but I'd be JUST …
-
Also... To mirror what others have noted... Apple's sneak preview of this FCPX a while back that got some GREAT cheers from the crowd...? I am sure it was because it was all based on the assumption that the new changes were built ON TOP OF all o…
-
For those of you defending this release due to it being a "rewrite/recode"... you are being far-too lenient. (IMHO) If Apple's focus was to rearchitect the core subsystem to build on, that's GREAT - but KEEP BUILDING and push the release out unti…