hugi
About
- Username
- hugi
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 33
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally posted by ThinkingDifferent Which still doesn't alleviate the need for compiler licenses. At the time we were using RCS but they have since migrated to PVCS. Of course, It was just meant as a joke.
-
Quote: Originally posted by ThinkingDifferent At that time we had about 100 developers. When you reach that number of developers, I always recommend that you use some sort of SCM.
-
Quote: Originally posted by baranovich He looks so CONSTIPATED
-
Quote: Originally posted by jabba But once you are up to speed with WebObjects, management will think you either have supernatural programming powers or work 18 hours a day Sssssh, not so loud, you'll let everyone in on our secret . But y…
-
Quote: Originally posted by mdriftmeyer Wrong. WebObjects Java Bridge support came after the merger. I know I worked at both places. I had to support WOF in Enterprise Technical Support. Cocoa WOF stomped the shit out of Java WOF. With X…
-
Quote: Originally posted by bborofka How does WebObjects compare to .Net? Everyone in my CS dept. at my University speak of .Net like it's some cutting-edge buzzword. They either love it or hate it, and most seem to love it... ("because it makes …
-
Quote: Originally posted by ast3r3x ...I use PHP So WO is that good huh? Need I say more?
-
Quote: Originally posted by macFanDave From what I've seen, the glory days of WebObjects was when it was an Objective-C system. When it went from ObjC to Java, the price went from $50,000 to $699. Wrong. * WO supported java alongside ObjC …
-
Quote: Originally posted by sunilraman is anyone besides Apple using WebObjects anymore? is it a dead end? i'm just totally ignorant, to me it's either Linux, J2EE on Tomcat, ASP, or PHP Mysql.... gawd my mind is totally f*ked i am soooo out …
-
Quote: Originally posted by Booga I must admit to not having evaluated WebObjects in several years. Glad its proprietary nature has changed. However, you can hardly claim that WebObjects is "intuitive"... it's just as counter-intuitive as any o…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Booga When Web Objects came out, it was far and away more powerful than anything and everything else out there. That was 10 years ago, and since then the world has caught up. Now, it's on par with a lot of other solu…
-
Quote: Originally posted by JBL Is WebObjects based on Cocoa? I am trying to figure out how opening it would help Apple in the enterprise space. What prevents people from porting it to Windows or Linux, which would neutralize any advantage it giv…
-
Quote: Originally posted by jabba As someone just posted/asked to the WO mailing list, the deployment situation seems to be unclear on other platforms: http://lists.apple.com/archives/webo.../msg00132.html Does this mean that a) I can st…
-
Quote: Originally posted by jabba Not WO 6.0, but at least Apple released WO 5.3... http://www.apple.com/webobjects/ So, afai understood WebObjects development is now free as part of xCode 2.1. Every copy of XCode 2.1 includes a WO inst…
-
CodeWarrior
-
*gurgle*
-
Quote: Originally posted by sunilraman dude this would so rock.
-
I hope Apple switches to x86. Then we would be rid of all those stupid "When is Apple switching to x86" threads
-
Quote: Originally posted by TednDi Or perhaps Steve will start using a new color for his mock turtleneck? or not.... Dress up Steve 8)
-
Quote: Originally posted by Jambo There's a WebOjects session on Tuesday titled "WebObjects Overview", the description on Apple's WWDC Conference Sessions page says: WebObjects is Apple's Java-based web application development platform. Learn …