weisbear
About
- Username
- weisbear
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 16
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by bigmc6000 I'm curious why no candidate pointed out the easiest and most "duh" way to save gas - above 40 mph roll up your windows. Maybe since I'm an engineer it makes perfect sense to me so I don't get why people don…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by wwwork I did not say people are dumb if they use fossil fuels. I said people that ARGUE AGAINST reductions in fossil fuel use. It's much different. I use fossil fuels every day but I would like to use less. There is…
-
I don't there is anyone who has had rudimentary physical science couses who does't believe that "CLIMATE CHANGES". It has changes for billions of years. (earth approx 4.5B years old). The discusion should be relegated to AGW. That means "Anthrop…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by wwwork The South pole is gaining ice mass because it is warmer. In extremely cold temperatures the air can not hold moisture so it does not snow as much. As it warms the air becomes moister and it snows more so more ic…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by OC4Theo What is important is not the health of business. The health of the earth and the health of the people is what is important. You cannot live in a dirty world where people are dying because of business profit. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by melgross It really wasn't that clear. Asking him to be more specific is always a good idea. We control little, as you can tell by your comments here. As are other mods here, I was a member first. But if this w…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by dasein Actually they're very progressive on a number of fronts: education reform, health reform, tort reform, tax reform, etc... Granted, they take a business standpoint, just as you would expect an environmental group…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by melgross I don't think anyone undrstands what you said. Could you be more specific? Mel, the moderate moderator who augments this discussion. Have you read the WSJ opinion article. Pretty clear to me what post…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by bwik It is humorous that the Wall Street Journal knows so little about modern business. Apple got where it is today by breaking molds and pursuing its vision. Not by following a bunch of hoary, MBA claptrap. Those…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by GQB Excellent example of right wing rebuttal. Glad you're so onboard with the easy melding of capitalism and totalitarian communism. But you're right... they do fit well together. No rebuttal... merely acknowledgin…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by catchblue22 The Wall Street Journal has become the Pravda of the neo-conservative right. Its editorial board can be depended on to support the right wing position without questioning or analysis. Its worldview has be…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by GQB Oh please... CoC (appropriate acronym, btw) is the leading shill for Corporatism, the cancer stage of capitalism. CoC opposes ALL regulation (kinda like the NRA opposes ALL limitations on weapons), and is a megapho…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by digitalclips I didn't know it had a 'news' channel! Spend less time in the glades dude. Look around at the world.
-
It costs almost nothing for Apple and Nike to be "progressive" in their stance vs the Chamber. They both know that the majority of pollution and carbon dioxide they produce in other countries will never be subject to US controls or US carbon tax…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Roc Ingersol If it's happening and we're a factor, then not changing our behavior is guaranteed to make it worse. So the question isn't just "Is it a problem" but "When will it be a problem" and "When will we have to …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by CurtisEMayle Yes, the obvious liberal nature of the award is a deplorable action .... for our president to be tossed a Nobel Prize instead of shoes (to paraphrase Hillary Clinton). Absolutely disgusting. At least th…