tomfoolery
About
- Username
- tomfoolery
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 70
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by g3pro No, it was very true. In response to those who said the iPhone did not have multitasking, users on this very board have said precisely what I said: it's unnecessary and it's too complicated. Maybe somebody di…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by addabox Is Premier making some kind of a comeback? Actually, yeah, it seems to be. I don't use it myself, so I can't comment, but the industry buzz for Premiere CS5 is quite good. But it's still a bit of a walled ga…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Avidfcp Does anyone realize what would happen if Adobe said, ya know, we are no longer making After Effects for the Mac? TV and commercials would go into a frenzy. Apple should watch out how far they keep pushing Adob…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by g3pro Whoa, multitasking? I think Apple fans' heads have just exploded. I thought multitasking was "a completely unnecessary feature"? I thought multitasking is "too complicated for ordinary apple users"? I…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jgibson24 There will be even less incentive to program a completely separate app for the iphone first once Android passes the iphone by in marketshare which is inevitable. Has the word "inevitable" taken on a new an…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by kotatsu Why can't I run a twitter or IM feed in the background Apple, you know, like you can do with Android? Because push notifications are better than continuous polling. "I want the stupid thing" is not a very co…
-
It seems like the basic reactions to the new background-processing stuff ("multitasking," if you insist) fall into three categories: Developers: "Hey, cool. Now I can keep the stuff that actually needs to persist persistent without having to do a…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Avidfcp ITS ALL ANOUT ITUNES. WHY GET FIR FREE WHST JOBS CSN MAKE YOU PAY FOR!!! Am dam# glad the media is makingba big deal out of this. 99% of all media sites use flash, from ABC, espn to major leauge baseball al…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Mac Voyer Haven't you heard, the Slate has already been killed by the Joojoo. Oh, man. I'd never heard of this before today. That's ? that's just appalling. Did you notice one of their product images on the front p…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TECHSTUD Flash Gordon need not apply. At least he still has Dale Arden. Rrrrow.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism There are different dynamics at play here. All true. But respectfully, that wasn't my intended point. To the extent that I had a point — albeit a painfully weak and only tangentially related one —*it was t…
-
Okay, sincere question: How many of you guys who've expressed support for worldwide standards would be opposed to Apple releasing an Verizon iPhone? I'm not being snarky. I'm totally serious. It's the exact same issue: China Mobile uses a differe…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism There numbers are not bogus that is a list of Apple's towers, not just the Mac Pro. this is to get an idea of when Apple is likely to update for a machine class based on historical data. Pretty simple. Pre…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism What's to compare? The word "average" has a meaning and I've posted a site that records the days between releases. Did you? Oh, I didn't notice. Your link was garbled so I guess my eyes skipped right over …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism It's still longer than the average update cycle for all 'pro' Macs. Well, it's hard to compare it to the MacBook Pro, because the releases have been all weird. First the 15, then later the 17, then the 13,…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism With this longer than average time? I'm totally not singling you out to beat up on you; this sentiment is frequently expressed here. It's not true, though. The first Mac Pro was announced in August of 0…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by gFiz forgive me, not very knowledgeable on the nitty-gritty..."2.5K" monitor? What's that? Sorry, that's industry jargon. When folks in film and television post say "2.5K," they're referring to a raster that's 2,56…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by gFiz I'm really interested in the 27" monitor price. I am too. Eizo doesn't have a 27" model, but their 30" 2.5K monitor retails for (cough) $4,300. Even their lower-end Flexscan comes in at over $2,500. Believe it …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by myapplelove Too bad for them, because I am going to be downloading any pdf circulating on the net for free. Quote: They can drm the shit out of the ebooks for all I care, but they have to offer them free with the p…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Ireland People who argue against eBooks being cheaper or either a blind idiot fanboy, a publisher or a fool. Right. Cause nobody who disagrees with you could possibly be a reasonable human being, or have a legitimat…