bruceedits
About
- Username
- bruceedits
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 40
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Shaun, UK Apple should have done one of the following IMHO: 1. Keep FCP7 & enhance it then launch FCPX as a seperate "in between product" called iMove Pro. 2. Say we are killing FCP coz we dont want to be in …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Robin Huber It seems to me that Apple has not made a mistake, but taken a conscious business decision. They see that the market for prosumer product is much greater than that for high end pros. There are already good o…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum "And no, they can't just switch between FCP7 and FCPX to get those features as the two do not share the same project file formats." This is not quite true. 1) There are no sequences in FCPX -- A FC…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by digitalclips Professionals would gladly pay $1000 had it been really powerful 64 bit 7 updated rather than a totally different and totally incompatible product. It's about work flow not price for professionals and edi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by WelshDog No I don't think that is it. The problem is that FCP created the concept of cheap, quality editing. And now that idea has rippled (ooh edit pun!) through the industry to the point that clients more and more …
-
I came to FCP from Avid Media Composer. While I still prefer Avid, I am getting used to FCP and all its foibles. Now comes this weird FCP-X which looks like a hybrid of consumer and pro interfaces. The fact that it cannot interface with 3rd party…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SpamSandwich The digitization of everything means wages flatten because previously high-cost functions migrate to the lowest cost supplier. This means "farms" of editors will spring up in India, China, Philippines, or …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by samwell No editor I've ever worked with in 15 years as a producer has come from an art school. Graphics and editing have a symbiotic relationship. However, when I was in film school, we were not expected to do graph…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by allmypeople Having used FCP for 9 years, I still am a bit hesitant on the interface. Excited to give it a go though... There are many things to like about FCP, but I still prefer certain aspects of Avid. Avid ha…
-
Yeah, $4999 is expensive, but I've been using my dual 1.8GHz G5 for the past 5 years and it is still pumping out Illustrator and Photoshop graphics, Motion graphics, After Effects files and SD video editing on FCP. So, I will upgrade to the new 6-c…
-
Could this announcement mean that the new Mac Pro, 6 and 12-core desktops are not far behind? Hope so.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by 1337_5L4Xx0R cachet. Wizard69: seriously. Thank you, grammar nazi.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ClassicGuy Unfortunately, those like that (myself incuded) are simply of no real concern any more. There was a reason why they wanted to get "computer" OUT of their corporate name. I was a professional photographer …
-
So, maybe there are a bunch of Nehalem-based Mac Pros in Apple's inventory and they want to clear those out before releasing the 6 and 12-core Mac Pros? Plus, where is that 27" LCD monitor? Come on Apple, your iPhone is nice, but we need you to re…
-
I hope Jobs introduces a new Mac Pro desktop. I've been waiting too long for the revised, 6 and 12-core model.
-
Any word on the new desktop Mac Pro with 12 cores? I am holding out to replace my G5 dinosaur. I run FCP v7 on a laptop, but need a desktop.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by foljs Right, so let's go back to needlessly harder to use tools, so people can appreciate real talent. Film stock and scissors, anyone? "Making easier" is not "Dumbing down". It actually is "Smartening up". …
-
I was a dyed-in-the-wool Avid user until I could not afford to upgrade to Avid's latest software-hardware config. I kept my Meridien-based system (still have it) until I realized FCP had surpassed its performance. I will think about returning to A…