steven n.
About
- Username
- steven n.
- Joined
- Visits
- 119
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,240
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,229
Reactions
-
Apple must fight $15.3B EU tax bill without US government help, court says
-
How the FCC's repeal of net neutrality could affect Apple
foregoneconclusion said:macwise said: Get rid of burdensome rules and regulations, and lean startups can take the market by storm.
We lost TWA, Baniff and PanAm due to gross mis-management. Picked up Southwest, JetBlue and many others.
Deregulation of the airline industry is a perfect example of why the Title II reclassification of the Internet was simply a bad bad idea. -
Google announces Android P, with strong emphasis on 'free and open'
ihatescreennames said:Mike Wuerthele said:rogifan_new said:Rene Ritchie (@reneritchie) So much of what I’ve been hoping to see in iOS dynamic interactivity and app unbundling is being presented by Google for Android.
Waiting to see Apple’s version. Hopefully soonish.
Some of the things Google announces today were reallly impressive. I hope Apple really surprises everyone and wows at WWDC.
There’s also the way voice assistants have “improved” over the years. Apple has frequently touted Siri’s ability to pull up sports scores and stats etc., but again, I rarely see people be excited about it. If you don’t care about sports (like me) then you’ll rarely use that feature, and if you’re INTO sports you’re likely not going to be satisfied with the limited results Siri provides or not want them (from the standpoint of not wanting to know the final score until watching the actual game). Is all the sports stuff an improvement to Siri? Certainly. But how much to it increase engagement? That’s what I want to know and likely never will. But I feel like that’s where ALL virtual assistants need to improve, getting people engaged in using them. -
Bloomberg obsessed with Google's Pixel, Apple's iPhone Supply Chain -- but not Google's Pi...
gatorguy said:maciekskontakt said:perpetual3 said:I think Google influences the media quite a bit. This was covered in the news awhile back.
I also agree that Apple stock is manipulated. I can’t prove it, but the pattern has been happening for awhile now.
But if ya got 'em post 'em.
IMHO Apple is more than capable with their own marketing, much of it free. Tooting their own horn is not something Apple fails at.
It looked like someone at Google was definitely actively removing news links discussing the Stagefright exploit. -
Editorial: Will Apple's 1990's "Golden Age" collapse repeat itself?
Good read overall but I admit to seeing some issues within Apple in a loss of focus and the ability to deliver. From the late delivery on the airPods (great product and I love them but no debating the late delivery), Apple's AirPower, the modular Mac Pro's shift from 2018 to 2019 and many more recent examples.
Also, there is a dip in quality in recent years of the delivered software but I think this is a result of major restricting happening within the software architecture as Apple moves more to Swift and away from Objective-C.
I question the loss of the Apple Cinema Displays and their wireless routers. Both were top of class and, in the case of the LG 5K, their third party replacements.... Not so good IMO.