dysamoria

lorca2770 said:

And who defend children from the mental and cultural castration product of the gods' lunacy?

What.

Rayz2016 said:

dysamoria said:

Uh, developers of “free apps”? Free as in loaded with ads or in-app purchases? Or were they *actually* free?

I do think Apple have changed from one company to another, and not for the better, but this specific argument of monopoly still doesn’t work. There’s something in there that’s anticompetitive practices, but monopoly isn’t really it.

Yup, “something in there”, but as usual, you don’t know what it is. 

I do and it’s irrelevant to this conversation. Get over yourself. I’m on Apple’s side here and it’s still not enough for you. Apple doesn’t need you defending them all day.

jimh2 said:

If only the plaintiff was made responsible for all legal costs associated with cases, we would no longer have class action lawsuits which only benefit lawyers.

That would CODIFY that only rich entities would be able to sue. Have you never met an artist who was trying to stop some scammer from selling their art on “stolen images printed on products” websites?

Also: why was “safety” even mentioned? A product need not have a safety issue to be reason to hold a company responsible for selling known defective products.

Uh, developers of “free apps”? Free as in loaded with ads or in-app purchases? Or were they *actually* free?

I do think Apple have changed from one company to another, and not for the better, but this specific argument of monopoly still doesn’t work. There’s something in there that’s anticompetitive practices, but monopoly isn’t really it.