forgot username

About

Username
forgot username
Joined
Visits
73
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
287
Badges
1
Posts
78
  • Apple must pay EU $14 billion over Ireland tax arrangement

    danox said:
    hexclock said:
    danox said:
    Companies (Slippery Eels) do not pay taxes we like to believe they do. They are just clearing houses. The customers pay the tax and the cost is passed down to the citizens (lowest level). Example Uber, and Airbnb, pay nothing but their drivers and customers certainly do.

    Mizrahi Developments, Walmart, Trump enterprises, the Guess company are other examples in a more evil sense. Don’t ever be a subcontractor/worker involved with these companies you will pay them.

    The Hudson Bay Company never paid taxes in their existence but the minions underneath certainly did.

    How does Ireland compare to continental Luxembourg, Switzerland, or Monaco, These countries are aristocratic tax havens, Ireland is an upstart blue collar country how dare they go above their station?

    Hopefully the money will actually be used to benefit the actual citizens of Ireland, but the way government works across the world I wouldn’t hold my breath, 1 billion or so Euros in the escrow account have already been lost in bad investments so far.
    Companies simply take advantage of tax laws to their benefit, just as anyone would. Do you pay more tax than you have too? I be you take every tax break you can, as I would. Doesn’t make them evil. We are all overtaxed, business included. 
    i’m retired, retired people do not get any significant tax breaks, at least not without a catch, lucky to have Prop 13 which had nothing to do with the grace of the politicians. most of the taxes I pay these days are use taxes and you can’t get out of them.
    It’s intriguing that you criticize companies for taking advantage of special treatment while simultaneously benefiting from Proposition 13, which shifts your tax burden onto new property owners and negatively impacts public school children.
    freeassociate2radarthekatronnMplsP
  • Apple's iPhone water resistance has a big catch, claims new lawsuit

    The ads have a disclaimer. The question is whether the disclaimer is prominent enough. I suspect future water ads will have a more prominent disclaimer. 
    watto_cobra
  • Apple's iPhone water resistance has a big catch, claims new lawsuit

    the Quebec Court of Apple ultimately upheld the decision that went against Apple. 

    I wish there were a Quebec Court of Apple  :)
    ForumPostwatto_cobra
  • iPhone 16 event expected to debut AirPods 4 with speaker, improved audio

    What about making the fit more secure and comfortable?

    Any tips for that for the AirPods Pro would be appreciated. The replacement ear pieces I found on Amazon were not a significant improvement. 
    watto_cobra
  • Apple's iPhone 16 case covers the new Capture Button, Spigen follows suit

    TouchID is not as secure as FaceID. But it would be nice to have available, so long as users understand that. 

    FaceID utilizes non-contact hardware, which is also used for other camera functions. In contrast, TouchID employs single-purpose physical contact hardware. Consequently, FaceID is likely to be more cost-effective, reliable, and easier to maintain in the long run.
    watto_cobraspock1234