analogjack
About
- Username
- analogjack
- Joined
- Visits
- 297
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,772
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 1,073
Reactions
-
Apple is de-bloating iTunes with latest 12.7 release, removes App Store
I hope they have removed that filthy genius thing in the sidebar, deleting it by placing it in a folder and then deleting that provides only temporary relief. I like the sidebar but I've been forced to use the dropdown instead of the sidebar because if I accidentally touch that friggen 'genius' hotspot my iTunes tries to connect and tell me it's having problems. Genius.
EDIT: bugger it's still there.
-
Apple debuts $999 iPhone X with OLED Super Retina Display & Face ID authentication
boltsfan17 said:lowededwookie said:I still don't understand the vertical camera array. The only way it makes most sense is in landscape mode but in portrait mode the depth perception will be out of whack. There's a reason our eyes are side by side horizontally and not vertically.
Vertical Video Syndrome, it's a disease.
-
Apple researching whether Apple Watch can detect common heart conditions
-
Qualcomm says Android always first to new technology, takes aim at iPhone X features
-
Qualcomm says Android always first to new technology, takes aim at iPhone X features
How often do we hear these tired tropes. At least they can take some cold comfort in their lonely little world while Apple goes nukular on them in the coming battle.
FFIW, I started out my career in the mid 70's in a professional laboratory hand processing E3 and C22 film in a manual sink line, I mention this because colour fidelity was the key to getting along in this industry. Some of the most finicky photographers would bring their 120 rolls to get them processed rather than take them to large facilities. The reversal on E3 was done by hand meaning that one had to physically wave a bright incandescent light over the rolls after they went through the hardener. I had to unroll and hand reverse them for this otherwise there would be an almost imperceptible red colour shift, maybe about 2 or 3 CC. Later on in my career when early digital printing onto film may have taken 4 hours to run off an 11x14 tranny, if there was the tiniest colour shift between the test and the final, all hell would break loose.
It was even worse with hand C type printing where a balance had to be made between skin tones neutrals and overall looks. This is all moot now with the miracles of end to end digital. But what I'm getting at is that I feel I am qualified to pass judgement on the Samsung OLED displays when I inspect them in a shop, which I do from time to time. I had a look at the new Galaxy S8 a few days ago against a iPhone 7 and speaking purely from an objective viewpoint the colour reproduction was abysmal. If I worked to that crappy standard I'd have been out of a job before I even started. The flesh tones are ridiculous, the contrast, the garishness everything is just wrong. I was quite surprised as I did expect something better. With top quality photos maybe it is fine, but when it comes down to images that are not perfect then it cannot find a balance that works. I really don't understand all the praise that is heaped on them. Also the Galaxy S8 with it's curved screen is atrocious, really ugly in comparison to not just iPhone but some other Android devices. But there you go.