crosslad

About

Username
crosslad
Joined
Visits
71
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
357
Badges
0
Posts
527
  • New Samsung ad attacks iPhone X download speed, ignores performance benchmarks

    What you really need is fast upload speeds. Then when your S9 randomly decides to send out all your photos to your contacts by Samsung Message, it can send them quickly and use all your data too. /s 
    lkruppAlex1N
  • Apple's cheaper iPhones are not the volume sellers pundits predicted: iPhone 8, X are

    gatorguy said:
    tmay said:
    gatorguy said:
    avon b7 said:
    wizard69 said:
    It is pretty delusional to believe that pricing isn't an issue.   It is pretty easy to argue that Apple could have sold a lot more iphones if they didn't price the things so high.
    If you're going to participate in comments, don't just show up and throw out a shovel of ignorant, shallow garbage.

    Apple set up a range of prices and the most popular weren't oriented to price, they were targeted at new styling and features. Surely you can piece that together.

    Android offers tons of cheaper options, but those maker aren't earning any profits and will eventually go out of business just like Nokia, Motorola, HTC, HP, and all the other low end Android makers in China that have already failed. 

    It's not clear Apple could build phones much faster than it currently is. If it lowered prices to boost demand, how would it build more at a lower price? Right now, Apple can afford to spend on advanced equipment and tooling and shipping to get products to market. How does it lower prices? Why should it? It's already neck and neck with the volume leader. Production has natural limits. 

    But again, when you offer ideas, make sure they have some value beside cynical snark. And point to some company that's doing better. Google priced its phones very low and couldn't sell them. It then tried to sell phones like Apple, and couldn't sell them. It's not easy. 


    His comment didn't need to go any deeper. 

    The 8 and X series were released late last year. There are only two quarters of official results to go by and Apple doesn't break numbers down so no one knows what is really happening. That's where analysts jump in with their numbers (estimates).

    Not long ago, analysts were claiming that the low end made up a sizeable chunk of Apple unit sales. More than 20%. That's for old hardware. Not shabby at all and while they may not be the 'most' popular, they seem to be popular nevertheless. Obviously price is a factor.

    Apple's sales remain flat. They have been for a long while. That doesn't look like its changing.

    People talk about Android discounting but I keep reading about Apple promotions for 2x1 8 series phones. I haven't seen one myself, though. I haven't seen a 2x1 flagship promo for Android flagships.

    People talk about small Android handset makers going out of business. That's consolidation. It happens in every mature market. What people don't see so clearly is that there are an unthinkably large amount of those handset makers still in business!

    So where are the sales of failed business going? To other handset makers. Android handset makers!

    Last year Huawei moved into second spot in unit sales, overtaking Apple. Apple clawed that position back with its peak quarters on its annual release cycle. Last year Huawei shipped 153,000,000 units. This year, their own goal is 200,000,000 units. That is massive growth and will put them into second spot again if they realise that growth.

    Widespread opinion places the P20 Pro as the best handset of 2018 at several hundred dollars cheaper than an iPhone X.

    You say that Android handset makers aren't making any money but Huawei is selling millions of phones, making billions and producing high quality innovative products.

    Rumours point to Apple reducing prices this year. If that happens you'll have to ask yourself why.


    FWIW ATT already did an iPhone X BOGO months ago, as has Sprint. TMo did a buy one and get $700 off another. TMo also had equivalent deals for some of the latest LG's and Samsungs. Deals on even new flagships aren't at all uncommon, including Apple's top of the line. 
    Were those Apple subsidized discounts and BOGO's? 

    Almost certainly not.; just carrier discounts to pick up a few switchers.

    Betcha that Android OS device makers are quite likely to provide carrier incentives to drive share acquisition.
    Neither of us know do we? You're guessing and I'd be doing the same. 
    Look at the prices of the S9 and the iPhone X on contract in the UK and yet the iPhone X still outsells the S9.
    tmayAlex1N
  • Siri used to summon medical assistance after serious motorcycle crash

    adm1 said:
    while admirable and a great life-saving feature. From my own experiences with Siri, if I was ever in the same situation...

    Me -Hey Siri, call 999!
    Siri -Let me think about that...
    Siri -OK, here's what I found for "colin mine find"
    Me -wtf

    3 or 4 attempts later and a few extra pints of blood lost, it works.  :sweat_smile: :trollface: 

    granted, it's maybe easier to tailor speech recognition in places where most of the country sound the same (Australia, US etc.) in the UK there are countless dialects and accents to deal with that vary so wildly.
    And yet Siri still manages to understand my broad Derbyshire accent as well as any of the other assistants. 
    Cesar Battistini Mazieromagman1979macseekerclaire1watto_cobra
  • Original Mac designer Susan Kare takes stand in Apple v. Samsung trial

    Without the copying Samsung wouldn't have sold these phones, so the damages should be applied to the whole phone. In fact the sale of one of these devices probably resulted in a loss of a sale to Apple. The damages should be based on how much profit Apple list, not how much Samsung made.
    radarthekatclaire1jony0watto_cobra
  • Microsoft to reportedly target iPad with cheaper Surface tablets

    KITA said:
    supadav03 said:
    So they are basically making Surface RT again? Cool...
    The Surface RT ran Windows RT, had a 16:9 aspect ratio, used an ARM processor and no pen.

    This runs Windows 10 Pro, has a 3:2 aspect ratio, uses an Intel processor and can use a pen.

    They're essentially making a successor to the Surface 3.
    Microsoft killed the Surface 3, I can't understand why they want to go back to it now.
    watto_cobra