rf40928

LOL .. is that why displaymate the authority on displays declared the iPhone 11 pro screen the winner ?

You talk about opinions and your comments are nothing but that

The iPhone i11 is the fastest phone in the world.. not only does it win nearly every speed benchmark it also outlasted the Note 11 in battery life by 2 hours..

In fact the iPhone every years has been the fastest phone on the world for the last 5 years ..FACT..

You probably think android having. More ram memory (8 Gigs of ram ) gives it an advantage right ?  Instead of the real reason that Android apps run on an emulator since they run on Java and require tons more memory then apps running on iOS..

The average person with 20/20 vision can’t see more the 330 pixels per inch... but each pixel is made up by smaller dots..

Samsung already declared they make more money selling Apple screens then they do from selling the Galaxy and Note line of phones..

Android makers are at the mercy of using the android ecosystem because at this point android and iOS are so established no one else can make a phone and compete unless they use android .. Apple dominates western markets all over the world.  

Samsung competes against all the other android makers - all android makers compete against each other which is why most don’t make any money.. because Phone makers make money..  not iOS and only google makes money from Android..  

Everyone compares android to iOS.. 
Only three phone manufacturers matter... Apple, Hauwei and Samsung.. only thing that matters is money .. Samsung and Hauwei has a net income  of 8 Billion (each)  from phone sales .. Apple was around 58 Billion after they paid their bills .. pretty obvious why Samsung admits they make more money selling Apple screens ..

As long as google is paying Apple a few billion each and every year just to have google as its main search engine that pretty much says whose running the show.. 

scorpio1023 said:

Samsung phones have always won awards for best display mainly because the resolution is higher. My phone has a higher resolution than the new iPhone. The iPhone only won best display this year (which is the only year it won)  because it gets brighter in doors. In my experience my S10 plus gets brighter with direct sunlight, but only by a small amount. 

When we read articles like this we realize this person doesn’t know very much... 

Android apps run on Java and to get around this they need a virtual machine ( an emulator )... this is because android could run on different processors and running android apps on snapdragon wouldn’t be native code.  

In English this means Android requires a lot more RAM to run as smoothly as the iPhone does — which runs code natively for apps ( without an emulator ) ... surprise surprise did we learn anything ?!  In this sense iOS is much more efficient with memory since there it needs no emulator and iOS Apps actually decide the memory allocated; yet for Android the memory is allocated by the o/s... because android has to constantly recycle and empty memory to free up...

IMHO the article wasn’t that great.  First of all it’s not accurate.. max nits for the iPhonee Pro is 1200!!!   You can’t set it at 1200... you can’t manually set it on 1200... it does it on auto when you go outside on bright daylight  .. the battery life has already been benched against the Samsung 10 Note and it beat it by 2 hours cycling thru programs continuously while playing music .. Androids phone can’t be compared to iOS phones  - First of all android apps have to run on an emulator ( a virtual engine ) and this is why Android phones have more memory!!! If they didn’t they would run horrible !! iOS runs apps natively and require less memory ...  so funny how android fan boys talk about the memory without understanding it’s not extra ram over the iPhone... droid phones simply need it !!

The iPhone cpugpu (soc) also beats snapdragon is most benchmarks.. cpu clock speed can’t be compared.. different operating systems .. different soc architectures .. different memory requirement ( more ram needed to android )

That’s it.. and iOS runs on more then phones ..Anyone who makes a phone is at the mercy of google..you can’t sell a phone and have any chance at selling a phone without a store for apps  and most droid makers make little money except Samsung and Hauwei.. 

Samsung said they made more money selling Apple screens then from their entire Galaxy line of phones.. iPhone has around 50% or more market share in most western countries.. Android has more market share because cheap.. very cheap android dominate poor Asian and Indian markets ( most of the worlds population)... Samsung hasn’t sold hardly any phones the last couple years in China because they cost too much and Hauwei has done well there  - This is the first year since iPhone 6 that (iPhone 11) has sold out in China and India  Also max nits for iPhone pro is same as Samsing.. 1200... it can’t be set this high manually.. it achieves this on auto mode when you go on bright daylight outside ( saves battery )

Could add much more but why ? IPhone is better

Most of the world is poor and can’t afford high end androids or iPhonss.. therefore very cheap androids dominate Asia and India which is most of the worlds population .. in western markets iPhone controls most of the market around 50% or more ( Canada 59%) and even market shares aren’t super accurate because they calculate this yearly on sales.. to put it another way iOS has a 1.6 Billion person user base .. 

cpsro said:

AppleInsider said:

While the iPhone 11 Pro Max has just 4 gigabytes of memory to work with, its six-core 

A13 Bionic therefore needs all the help it can get from the Neural Engine to properly compete.

Geekbench and most other benchmarks do not utilize or test the Neural Engine.
Apple's processors win because Apple jumped to 64-bit ARM design and SoC implementation with the iPhone 5S, at least 2 years ahead of when everyone else was planning to do so. The competition called 64-bits a gimmick, because they were caught flat-footed. And they're still working to catch up. The A13 wins on its merit, not because of some odd behavior required to "properly compete."

iPhones receive first-class support for iOS for at least 5 years. How does Samsung compare in this regard with Android?

IMHO the article wasn’t that great.  First of all it’s not accurate.. max nits for the iPhonee Pro is 1200!!!   You can’t set it at 1200... you can’t manually set it on 1200... it does it on auto when you go outside on bright daylight  .. the battery life has already been benched against the Samsung 10 Note and it beat it by 2 hours cycling thru programs continuously while playing music .. Androids phone can’t be compared to iOS phones  - First of all android apps have to run on an emulator ( a virtual engine ) and this is why Android phones have more memory!!! If they didn’t they would run horrible !! iOS runs apps natively and require less memory ...  so funny how android fan boys talk about the memory without understanding it’s not extra ram over the iPhone... droid phones simply need it !!

The iPhone cpugpu (soc) also beats snapdragon is most benchmarks.. cpu clock speed can’t be compared.. different operating systems .. different soc architectures .. different memory requirement ( more ram needed to android )

That’s it.. and iOS runs on more then phones ..Anyone who makes a phone is at the mercy of google..you can’t sell a phone and have any chance at selling a phone without a store for apps  and most droid makers make little money except Samsung and Hauwei.. 
Samsung said they made more money selling Apple screens then from their entire Galaxy line of phones.. iPhone has around 50% or more market share in most western countries.. Android has more market share because cheap.. very cheap android dominate poor Asian and Indian markets ( most of the worlds population)... Samsung hasn’t sold hardly any phones the last couple years in China because they cost too much and Hauwei has done well there  - This is the first year since iPhone 6 that (iPhone 11) has sold out in China and India .. 

GeorgeBMac said:

This review was great!   But, as with most reviews, it also made me a little crazy -- because it was so very one-sided:   Because, it ONLY LOOKED AT HARDWARE!

At this point, the hardware in even cheap phones is not only pretty good but more than most people need.

As always and since the beginning, what really sets Apple and its iPhones apart is iOS and the Apple Ecosystem.   In another 5 or 10 years when the power and speed of the Note 15 or 20 is double what it is today, it still won't be able to touch the iPhone -- simply because it doesn't run iOS and is not backed by the Apple ecosystem.

And that's not to trash the review:  The review was accurate and complete and reviewing OS's and ecosystems was not part of its scope.   But, for normal people trying to decide between phones, it is those things that make the iPhone a clear winner.