d70mac

Here's a typical scenario of what might have happened...

1. Apple HR requests a meeting.
2. Employee is told that an investigation into the employee conduct is being started.
3. At the meeting Apple requests access to her Apple Corporate telephone to conduct an investigation.
4. Employee says she does not have it and will provide it.
5. Employee leaves and then deletes certain apps and data before providing the requested Apple corporate telephone to Hr.
6. Apple examines the Apple corporate telephone and immediately finds date stamps showing that data was deleted between the time of the HR meeting and when the Apple corporate telephone was surrendered.

What is this Apple employee going to sue for? The employee acted unprofessionally by deleting information from an iPhone she knew was under investigation. There is no "ism" involved. Rather than letting the investigation play out she panicked.

A bigger issue...Perhaps Apple will begin to realize that mixing politics with business is in the long run a no-win scenario.

scartart said:

Anyone wanting the best low light performance needs to get the Pro Max over the Pro due to the larger sensor.

Absolutely agree. If you want the camera for photography the Max is the only choice! The Max has larger pixels and sensor-shifting (a high-end DSLR feature). I don’t know how well the features will be implemented but if photo/video is a priority the choice between the PRO and PRO MAX is clear. Get the Pro Max!!!

Perhaps this will be the last time that “supply chain gurus” will be given credence (iPhone X dead, least popular iPhone, sales are disastrous, etc.)  but I doubt it. There is too much money in the click-bait!