obxjim

jsmythe00 said:

teejay2012 said:

I see a distinction between refurbished Apple screens and counterfeit Apple 'look alike' screens. Thus I agree with the court decision, as long as no customers were given the impression that these were warrantied Apple screens, and none returned their repaired phones to Apple for other warranty considerations (which is unlikely).

I second this.  If it's not apple approved hardware being installed by an apple certified technician then your phone is out of warranty and apple isn't liable

So, I have had two iPhones replaced by ATT insurance. Both had issues from the start; home button quickly going bad, screens that dim in bright sun and otherwise change brightness constantly, white streaks plus other things that never work like an Apple iPhone. Why don't they get snagged up in this? My bad using ATT.com's insurance instead of Apple's, but Apple should go after them first (Att.com should go after their partner). It's awful they want to charge you for this crap!