- john gibson
- Last Active
Judge in Epic v. Apple trial presses Tim Cook on App Store model, competitionGeorgeBMac said:john gibson said:mylovino said:Apple has simplified software development and consumption in so many ways, and all the developers and customers both benefit from the large customer base Apple has created with their entire ecosystem, if at the end a judge is not balancing out cost versus benefits in light of the underlying economic system, it would be a really strange result. I lived through the evolution of development environments, remember times when licensing an IDE was a really expensive exercise and software distribution required high production and distribution costs, it is really bizarre that Epic tries to further increase their margin by challenging the „partner“ which adds the whole ecosystem they benefit from with billions of dollar.
Imagine if other stores tried to implement the same rules the App Store has and it becomes clear how outrageous some of the policies are. Tim Cook used the strawman argument:
Hey email CEO says App Store policy dispute is not about the moneyRayz2016 said:
Apple is doing nothing NOTHING to stop him communicating directly to his customers. That is not his problem. His problem is that under Apple's system, he cannot frame his pricing in a more favourable light.
Can they communicate directly to their customers that they could save 30% by cancelling via the AppStore and signing up through the website? No, they are banned from directly communicating that crucial information that would benefit the end user.
If Apple wants to go all out rent-seeking mode they should be consistent. It's ridiculous that I can download Salesforce Inbox and they present a sign in screen with no way to IAP a Salesforce license and no way to do anything other than stare at the login screen. But that and hundreds of apps like that are allowed. Apparently those apps are allowed based on some unwritten rule that if they consider it app an IT dept my purchase then the app gets a free pass to avoid IAP.
This type of capricious and arbitrary enforcement of rules might be perfectly acceptable for a company that faces lots of competition. But as Apple is part of a duopoly and they own 2/3rd of the mobile app market they are going to be the next company to land in the EU crosshairs. And if the political winds in the US change to where an administration wants to go after Apple, the Schiller suggestion that Hey raise prices on Apple customers is like a smoking gun example of a company abusing it's power to raise prices on consumers.