godofbiscuits

red oak said:

What is with your obsession writing about her? It is kinda weird 

Especially given you’ve never reported how she’s  pulled the same exact thing at previous companies 

What’s YOURS?  Apple lied to the SEC. That’s news. 

Bosa said:

These complainers don’t know how good they have it. Try working in Any other country or even Microsoft and see what happens 

Whataboutism isn’t a valid argument. 

slow n easy said:

lkrupp said:

pulseimages said:

Shouldn’t the suit be against the artist who used the sample illegally and not Apple? 

Deep pockets my friend, deep pockets. 🧳

Yea, but there should be laws against that. A fair system would hold to account the entity most at fault and the most willful instead of the one with the most money.

If Apple hadn't included it in an advertisement, it wouldn't have been an issue.

waveparticle said:

[...] the mission of personal computer: to create digital information.

Sez who?   

melgross said:

It’s not clear as to what these will be based on. There is plenty of time for them to be based on the A15 cores.

It's not strictly correct to say they're based on A15 cores:  the A15 and the M1-series are both derived from the same IP.   (as in, no, humans aren't descended from chimps, but rather both humans and chips share a common ancestor).  It may sound like a purely academic distinction, but as the Apple Silicon family gets broader and deeper, it's going to get more and more important to keep it clear.