dewme
About
- Username
- dewme
- Joined
- Visits
- 932
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 15,799
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 6,115
Reactions
-
Copyright laws shouldn't apply to AI training, proposes Google
eriamjh said:If a person can read it for free, then so should AI. Just because people can't regurgitate it, doesn't mean that since AI can it somehow should be prevented.
Anyone can be influenced by images, sound, text. So let AI do so.
If AI "copies" like a human, than sue the owners of the AI like a human. Fair use still applies. Sell it for profit, get sued.
No shields are needed. No restricting laws.
Maybe the problem will be AI can flood the world with "inspirations" and derivatives works, thus diluting a unique artists style or technique? That's probably an infringement.
Force credit where credit is due. Maybe that's the only law needed. Credit to human artists when AI is trained on them.
When AI generate something original, I'll be interested. Otherwise, AI is just a copying app.Thank you. You’ve captured my exact take on this. If a human can do something, albeit at absurdly slow speeds and volumes compared to a machine, then why should we disallow it?The whole point of automation is to serve its owners by vastly improving the speed, efficiency, productivity, volume, repeatability, etc., of tasks and processes that provide value to humans.The only intelligence in artificial intelligence is the intelligence that humans apply when they build the mathematical models and algorithms that are executed by machines. No machine has ever had a single “thought,” much less an original thought.The value behind the creation of intellectual property (IP) is derived from human thought. Invention is rooted in human driven original thought. Innovation is rooted in humans thinking up ways to derive productive value in ways that exploit human invention, domain expertise, experience, practicality, marketability, knowledge, learning, profitability, etc.
I don’t think Google is engaged in anything nefarious here. They are simply applying learning and discovery principles and mechanisms that have been employed by human researchers, innovators, and everyone seeking to extend the state of the art beyond what is currently known and understood. Human knowledge is cumulative.To build a better mouse trap you have to take a look at what are currently considered the best mouse traps. Otherwise, why bother? -
Encrypted iMessage chats lead to record-breaking SEC fines for Wells Fargo, Wall Street
Calvin_Hobbes said:Financial expert Clark Howard refers to Wells Fargo as "a criminal enterprise impersonating a bank." And still after how many years and how much in fines does WF continue its nefarious ways?? -
Apple Music debuts new algorithmic Discovery Station radio
appleinsideruser said:dewme said:This begs the question: How do I quickly flag a song on my iPhone or iPad so I can dig into other songs from the same artist? I can select "Show song in Apple Music" on my Mac, but I haven't figured how to do the same thing on other platforms.
So far (2 minutes!) I’ve not had your positive experience. I’ve not liked the 3 things it’s pushed (from artists I know of, but don’t really like). Counter to your experience, I find the My Station, often inserts unknown stuff that I like… Go figure!
I only commented on the Discovery Station. For me it inserts unknown music that I generally like, but not in every single case, and it also inserts known music that is already in my music library, which I obviously like already. My point is that the "discovery" seems to be more geared towards reinforcing more variety into genres you already like, based on what is already in your library, as opposed to finding things that aren't as closely adjacent to what you've already committed to by virtue of what you already have in your library.
To be clear, I'm not suggesting that I want Discovery Station to throw in a heavy metal track when it "thinks" I prefer, for example, traditional bluegrass. That would be pretty harsh and something I would want to "discover" all on my own. I'm more thinking along the lines of bringing in earlier or later work by an artist I already follow, or work that an artist did with another band or as a studio musician for a different artist, or in a different genre, for example, Duane Allman or Jimmy Page. -
Microsoft dumps Cortana leaving Siri as one of the last smart assistants
Microsoft under its current leader has been steadily sloughing off the baggage and detritus left behind by its former leaders so they can focus on the things that have more upside potential going forward. This is no different than what Steve Jobs did when he returned to Apple. Focusing on what matters and what makes a difference is called “being smart.” -
Stage Manager updates in iPadOS 17 don't go far enough quite yet
Ironically I’ve lately been forcing myself to use Stage Manager on my devices because of all the hoopla surrounding its availability. So far I don’t really see it as an improvement at all, but that’s because of the way I use my devices and computers.I’m not one of those people who leaves everything open and has 67 browser tabs open all of the time. I generally close or minimize everything I don’t need for the tasks I’m doing at any given time. If I need multiple windows open on my dual screen Mac I open them and put them where I need them. My experience so far with Stage Manager doesn’t seem to add any value, especially on multiple monitor setups. Ymmv.
On the other hand, Universal Control and Sidecar are absolutely amazing. They give me instant mouse and keyboard access or extra screen real estate on the two iPads (pro and mini) that sit under my two VESA mounted Mac monitors. Apple nailed it here.I’ll keep slogging away with Stage Manager until either it finally clicks or I get tired of trying to make it work for me. And I’ll continue to look at those users who have dozens of tabs open in browsers and layers of app windows open with puzzlement.What are they doing? Are their offices and desktops that messy too? What’s with all those fingerprints and smears on their screens? Terrible, simply terrible.