kevin kee

robin huber said:

Waiting for the CNET story that focuses on the negative element of this story--the poor calorie counting of Watch. Ignoring the fact that all the others did poorly in that category as well. Because that's just how they roll. 

The kind of people who focus on a tiny bit shortcoming of otherwise perfect device - and then magnify it a hundred times to make it sounds worse than the actual. Yeah, seen that many times everywhere. I am still using my AW first gen everyday, as well as in the gym. The heartrate is normally consistently the same as the chest strap on cardio machine.

gatorguy said:

ericthehalfbee said:

gatorguy said:

cali said:

Finally they flaunt privacy. Most android morons think their knockoff iPhones are just as secure.

radarthekat said:

Define 'popular.'  If that means 'handsets chosen based upon cost mostly by those who can't afford an iPhone,' then yeah, Android phones, in aggregate, are definitely more popular than iPhones.  Sure.

Everyone wants iPhone. Not everyone can have one.

Privacy and security are not the same thing. Android is VERY secure. Privacy in the Google version perhaps not so much. With that said privacy is not really the issue some of us would like it to be. Most folks simply don't care all that much, as evidenced by billions of Facebook visits every day where people spill their guts about family, illness, friends, special events and places and often to complete strangers. 

Android will never be as secure as iOS. This is a fact that will never change despite you claiming otherwise.

That does not mean Android is not VERY secure. Your second sentence is quite odd as it's not something I've claimed is it? 

It does mean Android is not VERY secure, although perhaps you were saying that does not mean Android is VERY not secure - in that case I agree with you.

radarthekat said:

Define 'popular.'  If that means 'handsets chosen based upon cost mostly by those who can't afford an iPhone,' then yeah, Android phones, in aggregate, are definitely more popular than iPhones.  Sure.

The word "popular" has been misused a lot in this context that caused not a small amount of misunderstanding. When one use the word "popular" it implies a popular choice by human, such a choice was made because people like it and feel joy while using it. Can we definitely say that applies unconditionally to Android phones? I don't think so. iPhone is popular. Android is well, common. Common is not Popular just like water, air, and rocks - they are common and everywhere but NOT popular.

On main topic, I like these ads especially the Privacy and Fast. I don't think they are made to be dead serious, but enough sense of humour to make them kinda interestingly comedic. 

Not unexpected. The three months trial is at premium tier with no ads, while charged it is only 99 cents. I surprise it took Apple this long. Other company like Spotify already charged people for their trial service in Australia. This is just a competitive move by Apple, nothing much.

dominosixtyseven said:

Typical DeD article.

Well if you want lies and Samsung coddling go and read : http://bgr.com/2017/05/16/galaxy-s8-sales-figures/ or http://mashable.com/2017/05/16/galaxy-s8-sales-5-million/#2TXfyrCj7Pqj or any websites you can find when you google Samsung Galaxy S8 - they all love Samsung new hot sales (imagine if it was Apple, they would shred it apart). Only AI tells the fact, 5 Million is 5 Million, but even that you can't accept the truth.