mike1
About
- Username
- mike1
- Joined
- Visits
- 238
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 6,339
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 3,503
Reactions
-
'Silo' renewed for two more seasons as series finale looms
-
Apple Intelligence second wave arrives today -- what you need to know
-
FBI suggests use of encrypted messaging apps while US faces huge cyberattack from China
-
Mac mini M4 Pro review: Mac Studio power, miniaturized
Mike Wuerthele said:keithw said:Totally disagree about the Studio. For pros who need the graphics power, RAM, and CPU, the Studio will again be a good choice once they finally update it to the M4 Max and M4 Ultra. Right now, it's a terrible choice and nobody should buy it. I need the power of the M4 Max but I'd rather get a Studio than a MBP, which I don't really want of need. I'm guessing the M4 Max chip wouldn't even fit inside the new mini and the thermals would not work either. Bring on the M4 Studio, sooner rather than later.
I think the comment that you also replied to. -
iPhone 17 Slim too thin for SIM tray, may not have mmWave
addicted44 said:Why does Apple insist on bullshitting its users.The Vivo X5 Max that came out a decade ago was 4.75mm thin and not only did it have a SIM, it had a Dual Sim where the second SIM slot could also be used for a MicroSD card.If they find that a SIM card slot is now unnecessary then all power to them. But it's really fascinating that they instead spew lies making it appear that the device is just way too thin for a SIM card, and worse, expect people to lap it up without ever realizing that Apple is just blatantly insulting their intelligence.
I'm not going to bother with a list of functionality, features and technology that a modern smartphone has that didn't exist a decade ago. I guess they believe the space that would be required for the tray is better consumed by something else.