bluefire1
About
- Username
- bluefire1
- Joined
- Visits
- 532
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,666
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,318
Reactions
-
Apple employees express concern over new child safety tools
Apple prides itself on safeguarding user privacy. Once you open the door for any exception, no matter how laudable, you begin a slippery slope that will make the word privacy hollow.
This is a vacuous decision by Apple that needs to be reconsidered.
-
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G and Galaxy Z Flip3 5G announced at Galaxy Unpacked
Apple’s likely on the same path, but with superior versions of the products.
-
Apple privacy head explains privacy protections of CSAM detection system
If the door is even slightly ajar, others will find a way to enter with or without Apple’s consent.
-
Fed expansion of Apple's CSAM system barred by 4th Amendment, Corellium exec says
For a company like Apple which is so fervent about privacy rights, it’s both disconcerting and alarming that they’d carve out any exception regardless of how righteous or noble the cause.
-
Epic Games CEO slams Apple 'government spyware'
By that logic, banks should be able to check what’s in their vault boxes without the customer’s knowledge to monitor for illegal images.crowley said:
If it's being uploaded then it's not simply private data, it's data that the user is pushing into Apple's domain. Why shouldn't Apple take steps to verify that they aren't being asked to host illegal photographs?newisneverenough said:Apple completely screwed this up. It’s conceptually wrong from the start. I can’t believe this even got initiated as a project. It’s idiotic to try and excuse looking into private data by justifying the method of the technology. Apples entire stance before now is something I have supported. In this ridiculous step they’ve utterly failed. And should cancel this initiative.
