staticx57

foggyhill said:

staticx57 said:

Just as the Pro 9.7" has two calibration settings, the GS7 has calibration settings as well. One of which is calibrated sRGB and the other is calibrated AdobeRGB. Had you bothered to read the article you would have found out.

WHy the hell are you even here, what's your point? Same thing Goldfish here, always the same constant regurgitated pap about Android crap.

 When your OLED screen declines to also ran in 2 years, the LCD screen will be essentially the same.
 3 years later, still mostly the same (considering this one can even self adjust the screen for gray scale, even more so than before).

But, hey, hero worship, little dance, etc. Whatever.

foggyhill said:

staticx57 said:

HTC has been an Apple Licensee for years now.

Really, please post me a HTC link then; should be easy. Otherwise I'll think you're talking crap.

foggyhill said:

So, if airplay the news, why go on on specs like a spec jockey.
Funny specs are not important now for Android in Marketing yet that's all we hear from the tech press about their phone.

Did they license it (doubtful) or reverse engineer it (probable)?

sog35 said:

6Sgoldfish said:

So, now DisplayMate is a reliable source, but when it quoted the Galaxy S7 Edge's display as the "Best Performing Smartphone Display that we have ever tested" people on AI were calling it crap-talking and bought-out by Samsung. ;-)

Anyhow, I'd love me a small iPad Pro as my first iPad. I tried the pencil several times on a friend's device and it does work like a charm. Yet I cannot justify the additional expense as something I could actually use for work other than content consumption and the occasional sketch. Perhaps if it ran OS X instead... 

Nope. My eyes are the most trusted source. PERIOD.

Everyone's eyes are different. There is zero reason to buy a tablet/phone based on someone elses anaylsis. NO matter how many tests they used, it can't reproduce what your brain/eyes are seeing.

IMO, Samsung S7 colors are way exaggerated and over saturated. I don't care what Display mate says.  The iPhone screens look way more real and accurate.

sog35 said:

6Sgoldfish said:

I'm talking design while you are responding with knee-jerk, irrelevant (erroneous, even) points. Eg. screen not only isn't arguable, according to displaymate.com "Galaxy S7 becomes the Best Performing Smartphone Display that we have ever tested." 

Sorry but displaymate.com is the not the authority on which screen is better.
Just because displaymate.com says its the best means crap really.
Just visit displaymate.com.  The site looks straight from 2005, so dated. That just tells me displaymate.com isn't a big player and could easily be 'bought out' by Samsung.

From personal experience using my OWN EYES (which is the only eyes that matter to me) the S7 colors are oversaturated. The colors are off.  The greens look radioactive and everything pops way too much. I guess if you want something that looks flashy then the S7 is for. In contrast the iPhone screen looks nature and the colors look accurate. More realistic. People say the S7 image POPS. But do things POP in real life?  I say no.