staticx57

bobschlob said:

staticx57 said:

Just disagreeing with DED's style of writing is enough to get you down-voted. I thoroughly enjoy all the Apple products I own and recommend them to others, but I do not need DED to constantly justify my purchases by bashing other companies in the style he does. 

Ah. so it's just "style" you have a problem with. Not the content.

Holding DED to standards does not make me a windows or android fanboy.

josha said:

staticx57 said:

Regardless of the truth of the title, nothing in the article supports it.

Read the article again; carefully !

None of what he cited (barely and mostly cited himself) supports the headline.

corrections said:

staticx57 said:

Regardless of the truth of the title, nothing in the article supports it.

Except for the research, other journalists, the upranked opinions of Ars readers, the cited Android fan, and statistics. 

There's nothing controversial here, just the half dozen AI accounts created to bash articles they find offensive to their hopes. 

Then cite these in your article.

tele1234 said:

staticx57 said:

Because it is contrary to DED clickbait

I'm beginning to think AppleInsider is nothing but clickbait, they misreport things like this and get two breeds of people - mindless fandroids defending them, and the equally mindless apple fanboys praising it.

Just disagreeing with DED's style of writing is enough to get you down-voted. I thoroughly enjoy all the Apple products I own and recommend them to others, but I do not need DED to constantly justify my purchases by bashing other companies in the style he does. 

tele1234 said:

Why does every article which mentions how horrible and bad it is that the version numbers aren't universally highest across android also fail to mention that API upgrades are done independently of the OS/Kernel version and reach back further than Apple's support for iOS?

Because it is contrary to DED clickbait