macplusplus

About

Username
macplusplus
Joined
Visits
296
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
3,141
Badges
1
Posts
2,120
  • Inside iOS 11: Files app brings some user control of documents stored on an iPad or iPhone...

    Anyone know if there is a way for files app to see and interact with external drives.. (with either wired or wireless connection)? Thanks....
    External drives provide their own apps, from there you can copy to iCloud Drive or other app repositories.
    Thanks Macplus 
    my main issue is to see if Files App will interact with external drives.. and act as a consolidated centralized file managment sys. 
    If i have to use other apps to get the task done the whole purpose is defeated. 
    Thanks for the pointers though !

    I don't understand why this is your main issue with iOS. iOS does not offer drive/storage management since the very beginning. You can't attach a USD or network drive to iOS and format it for example. Use a laptop for such jobs. If you refuse to use the app provided by the drive producer and blame iOS for that, sorry but no one can help you, even the drive producer.

    According to thanx_al's response above, once the drive producer's app is installed, it may appear as a Location in Files app. But again, this (integration with the Files app) is at the discretion of the drive producer and you absolutely depend on that app. iOS will not perform drive management for you.
    MartyvH
  • Inside iOS 11: Files app brings some user control of documents stored on an iPad or iPhone...

    jurassic said:

    One thing I noticed about "On my iPhone/iPad" is that you can't save files to the main level, and you can't create or rename folders. You can only put things in a folder for an existing app.

    For example, I wanted to save some web images to "On my iPhone/iPad", but I had to choose an existing app's folder (I chose "Pages") to drop those files into. It is a new folder, not the same "Pages" folder that is on my iCloud Drive.

    I hope Apple will create an update for iOS 11 that will allow users to put files into "On my iPhone/iPad" at the top level, or to create and name their own folders.

    That won't happen. There is no centralized document repository in iOS as one of its main differences from desktop operating systems. in iOS only apps have document repositories. If you need a centralized document repository in iOS then this is the iCloud Drive.
    GeorgeBMacMartyvH
  • Apple's Craig Federighi details Face ID in new interview [u]

    bb-15 said:
    I don't recall any in the wild hacking of Touch ID where a completely unknown fingerprint was found on a phone, that fingerprint was duplicated in rubber/plastic and it turned out that it was the right print which could unlock the phone. 

    That is an old joke. TouchID scans the already identified live finger behind the glue replica. There is no optical scanning in TouchID, it works by scanning the electric field of the live skin.
    jony0
  • A11 Bionic processor in iPhone 8, iPhone X contains first Apple-designed GPU, new secure e...

    jahaja said:
    I guess that in just a few years, cellphones will be powerful enough to be our main computers in life and by simply connecting a stand-alone screen and a keyboard, it converts into running a full-scale OS system. Separate laptops, iPads and Apple TV will be obsolete.

    The only thing that could hamper this evolution would be the decrease in number of items people would need to buy, i.e. loss of sales. However, the mobile device will be more premium and worth a higher price, and the secondary devices like stand-alone screens, Apple Watch and wireless earphones, will be the same. Furthermore, I think this evolution is a reason that Apple is investing heavily in content.

    So all in all, the future would be:
    • A phone with processing power and storage space enough to replace not only our current phones, but also our iPads, laptops, "home computers" and Apple TV
    • Separate screens to connect wirelessly for when we need larger screen estate or to run full-scale OS. In most households one 10-15" to replace the iPad and one 30" and above to replace the home computer and the TV.
    • An Apple Watch or similar for the most mobile situations.


    Another option, of course, is sharing processors and storage space at a centralized location like a cloud service, and all devices consisting of simply a screen and processing and signal transmission enough to communicate with these. However, speed and privacy would be an issue. The benefit, of course, would be sharing processors and storage space so that none is redundant. Cheaper and more efficient. Plus, no need for backups as this would also be automatic and in much safer hands than our homes – if we can trust the service provider.
    "I guess that in just a few years, cellphones will be powerful enough to be our main computers in life and by simply connecting a stand-alone screen and a keyboard, it converts into running a full-scale OS system"

    iPhones are already powerful enough to do that. Question is, will Apple implement the technology within iOS to allow that to happen? Samsung has already started going down that path with DEX.
    With Continuity built deep into macOS, iOS, watchOS and tvOS we already use many devices as ONE. It is oxymoron to demand LTE to be everywhere and being stuck at the age of cabled/docked connection.
    As much as we live in a mobile-first world, doesn't mean we live in a mobile-only world. Most mainstream users don't need anymore performance and / or features than their smartphone provides. But sometimes when they're at home & their office they want a big-screen experience. I think it's a great idea if you can just dock your smartphone and have a desktop experience when you need it.
    If they want that big screen experience with their iPhone, then there is AirPlay. AirPlay makes the smartphone screen big, on TV. If the TV screen doesn't satisfy them, then there is the Mac. If this is browsing photos, then there is iCloud Photo Library, the iPhone photos are also on the Mac to be displayed on whatever monitor attached to it. If this is a document worked out on the iPhone, the same document is ready to be edited on the Mac, and vice versa. Thanks to iCloud, Continuity, macOS and iOS, one absolutely doesn't need to dock anything to anything. Samsung has to write the whole operating system from the ground-up to achieve such level of integration with its dock. The Apple platform offers true multiple-devices-as-one architecture.

    Edit:
    Those "convertibles" are already the incarnation of the dock legend, you know, "tablets" as laptop "screens". Those are called "toaster-fringe" in Apple's jargon and have pushed the PC industry at least five years backward...
    tmaywilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • A11 Bionic processor in iPhone 8, iPhone X contains first Apple-designed GPU, new secure e...

    jahaja said:
    I guess that in just a few years, cellphones will be powerful enough to be our main computers in life and by simply connecting a stand-alone screen and a keyboard, it converts into running a full-scale OS system. Separate laptops, iPads and Apple TV will be obsolete.

    The only thing that could hamper this evolution would be the decrease in number of items people would need to buy, i.e. loss of sales. However, the mobile device will be more premium and worth a higher price, and the secondary devices like stand-alone screens, Apple Watch and wireless earphones, will be the same. Furthermore, I think this evolution is a reason that Apple is investing heavily in content.

    So all in all, the future would be:
    • A phone with processing power and storage space enough to replace not only our current phones, but also our iPads, laptops, "home computers" and Apple TV
    • Separate screens to connect wirelessly for when we need larger screen estate or to run full-scale OS. In most households one 10-15" to replace the iPad and one 30" and above to replace the home computer and the TV.
    • An Apple Watch or similar for the most mobile situations.


    Another option, of course, is sharing processors and storage space at a centralized location like a cloud service, and all devices consisting of simply a screen and processing and signal transmission enough to communicate with these. However, speed and privacy would be an issue. The benefit, of course, would be sharing processors and storage space so that none is redundant. Cheaper and more efficient. Plus, no need for backups as this would also be automatic and in much safer hands than our homes – if we can trust the service provider.
    "I guess that in just a few years, cellphones will be powerful enough to be our main computers in life and by simply connecting a stand-alone screen and a keyboard, it converts into running a full-scale OS system"

    iPhones are already powerful enough to do that. Question is, will Apple implement the technology within iOS to allow that to happen? Samsung has already started going down that path with DEX.
    With Continuity built deep into macOS, iOS, watchOS and tvOS we already use many devices as ONE. It is oxymoron to demand LTE to be everywhere and being stuck at the age of cabled/docked connection.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra