camber

On the one hand they floated a trial ballon which attracted a lot of flack so they scrapped it. Could indicate that Apple is listening to its constituents.

On the other hand I do not see much consideration for the needs and desires of those who do the browsing. Consumers get the shaft. Again!

This is another of those delusional lawsuits. No one forces me or any other iPhone/Apple Watch owner to use Apple Pay! This, in part at least, has occurred because of the excess number of ambulance chasers (lawyers) in the US who lay in wait to seduce naive and foolish consumers into a lawsuit whose fees will only be paid if they "win". There are more lawyers per capita in the US than in any other country in the world and Apple, because of its success, has the biggest target painted on its back that any company has ever had!. Any payment system that collects and remits payments deserves to earn a small fee. The idea that because Apple has made such large profits that anything it does MUST be anticompetitive and a violation of Sherman antitrust laws - a law that is so out of date for the times that it ought to be repealed or at least modernized - is delusional. I am not sure the same doesn't apply to the judge who was foolish enough to allow the suit to proceed. It is absolutely disgusting!

If you want to stack the units put a pice of high density foam between them to reduce the vibration effects to a negligible level.

It is also available in Canada!@

So why does everyone appear to forget that when Google now and Alexa responded to about 3 languages, Siri was handling 20 languages?