fasterquieter
About
- Username
- fasterquieter
- Joined
- Visits
- 72
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 157
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 90
Reactions
-
Apple takes TSMC's whole 3nm production capacity for Mac, iPhone, iPad
-
iPhone 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S20 - $999 premium smartphones head-to-head
-
NBC's 'Peacock' app could have live television streams when launched
-
Compared: The 2019 Amazon Fire HD 10 versus the 10.2-inch 7th gen iPad
I bought the previous version for $99. I was very pleased with myself, as I'd have a tablet to take traveling without having to worry about losing it. Traveling with my expensive iPad Pro made me very nervous. Turns out is was just a waste of $99. The volume was too low, the screen had a terrible light leak that drew my eye away from any movie I was trying to watch. It was too dim to see in a bright room. It was painfully slow. Almost felt broken sometimes waiting for the home screen icons to appear. I hated it so much.
The article states that if you don't have enough money then you don't have a choice between this and the iPad. This is true, but I think a third option is to put the extra $150 toward a better phone. I found the Kindle device to be so horrible to use, I used my phone instead. Maybe the faster chip will make this revision worth it, but I doubt it. -
Here's what you need to know about lossless Amazon Music Unlimited HD