prismatics

OLED is something like technical solution in search for a problem. There are other, much more advanced technologies available for integration in phones and big screens. At least that is my opinion.

danielchow said:

This was probably why Apple is discontinuing their current hardware because it’d be a waste of resources to keep manufacturing the Airports when a new hardware standard is going to come out (?)

WPA3 can be easily implemented in todays WPA2 compatible systems since it is based on the same hardware acceleration for the cryptography happening under the hood.

I'm highly excited hearing about WiFi Certified Easy Connect. I hope it can solve the Internet of Thing's security problems when connecting to WiFi home networks which represents a major attack vector in home networks

racerhomie3 said:

Koll3man said:

nunzy said:

Bye bye, Qualcomm. Maybe suing Apple was a bad idea, eh?

Yeah big win for Apple, not so much for future iPhone users but who cares Qualcomm makes the best mobile phone modems? These are just unimportant details.

Keep telling yourself that. No one cares. Ooh I cannot get ‘that extra 5megabit’ .
Most people don’t also buy the iPhone ‘because FaceID is 3 years ahead , or A9 uses NVMe SSD controller 

Why are people spreading non-knowledge. Its not about teh megabites, its about receiver sensitivity. As the radio receiver front-end is more sensitive (which Qualcomm achieves to a high degree, about 10 dBm more sensitive (which is HUUUUUGE) than Intel modems in iPhone 8 AFAIK) the baseband processor can work with weaker signals. Intel modems are shit in this respect. I can only agree to what Koll3man had to say. Actually iPhone 8 feels like downgrade compared to iPhone 6 when I first went online with cellular data.

Soli said:

But certain posters here keep telling me Apple has given up on the Mac. 

I'm not saying Apple is giving up but I'd like to see product instead.

Ads don't convince me.