why-
About
- Banned
- Username
- why-
- Joined
- Visits
- 18
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 256
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 305
Reactions
-
New photos show possible Lightning-equipped EarPods for Apple's 'iPhone 7'
-
Alleged 'iPhone 7' chassis shows symmetrical speakers, lacks 3.5mm headphone jack
-
Apple hands out rainbow Apple Watch bands to commemorate LGBT Pride
-
Apple hands out rainbow Apple Watch bands to commemorate LGBT Pride
fastasleep said:why- said:
thanks lmao -
Apple hands out rainbow Apple Watch bands to commemorate LGBT Pride
And this counts as an argument to you? How far society has fallen.tallest skil said:
And yet what we call romance is the result of physiological changes within the body.tallest skil said:
And yet that’s not even remotely an answer to the question. If they’re normal, why would they die off in one generation?"sex·u·al in·ter·courseyou know you keep saying that but I really doubt it's true. I'd reckon if you were talking to someone who suddenly told you they were trans you'd run away, an action commonly associated with fearNOUNsexual contact between individuals involving penetration"
piss off
tallest skil said:
2. No one is afraid of homosexuals. No one is afraid of trannies.tallest skil said:
Can’t really “debunk” medical science, can you? I mean, if the brains of sane people show one thing and the brains of a selected group show another, that’s sort of... definitive.
actually the study just said that these other 30 men were heterosexual, not sane. they could have been straight men with psychotic disorders, you never knowtallest skil said:
If you are taking “correctional therapy” to mean “lopping off your genitals and shooting yourself full of fake hormones”, then I absolutely agree.tallest skil said:
The point is not to discuss the veracity or efficacy of any historic treatments for homosexuality. The point is simply to outline the existence of the mental illness itself.tallest skil said:
No, it’s because doing so gets them into trouble. In many fields scientists are strong-armed into silence because the alternative is to be blackballed and denied funding (or to have their credentials stripped entirely), regardless of the scientific truth of their statements.
“...First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident...”lol nopetallest skil said:
Great argument. Meanwhile, again, all medical and neurological science proves otherwise.