slow n easy
About
- Username
- slow n easy
- Joined
- Visits
- 75
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,263
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 404
Reactions
-
Twitter imposes limits on readable tweets to beat 'scraping'
I don’t care. I don’t read anywhere close to 600 tweets a day. I use to follow Musk, but I unfollowed him due to his stupid ass crazy posts. I do follow all of his companies though. You might not believe it, but he is building millions of humanoid robots. At first he will be using them for his Tesla factories. After 30 years, Boston Dynamics has 2 robots for sale (Spot and Stretch). Tesla only started developing their robot last year, and it should be mass production ready is just a few years. The reason why they can build millions is because while the Boston Dynamics robots cost a minimum $100,000, the Tesla Bot should cost under $10,000 with far more capability.
-
Apple TV+ cancels 'High Desert' after only one season
I watched all episodes, but thought it was only so-so. But on the other hand, it’s certainly no worse than physical, and that show got 3 seasons. -
Despite praise for Apple Vision Pro, 'Pokemon Go' dev evolves into smaller company
Yea, I mainly see the Vision Pro as an indoor device. Others may use it outdoors, but I wouldn’t. -
Up close and hands on with Apple Vision Pro at Apple Park
It’s not hard to type a word. Just fucking type it.eightzero said:
You missed my point, so skippit. No one in 1963 thought we'd be landing on the moon in 5-6 years - until we decided to make it a priority and did so. "Of course" is hindsight, something that is always 20:50.Xed said:
Of course we were. Untess you're a conspiracy theorist, we landed there in 1969.eightzero said:
In 1963 we were not 5-6 years away from landing on the moon.Xed said:
1) They've moved away from i-naming scheme.h4y3s said:Remember folks, this is just an early prototype of the eventual "Apple iGlasses". This one built for programmers and developers to get their hands on something that works before they roll out the final product, which will look more like a pair of Ray-Ban's and you will wear all day! Maybe in five or six years.
2) We are not 5 or 6 years away from getting an M-series chip (or any of the other HW) into something the size and weight of a pay of Ray-Bans.
Clearly we were, and it was obvious since we already had the same SoC in a much smaller Mac Studio. All they did was effectively get PCIe slots in the chassis from the previous Mac Pro.In 2017 we were not 5-6 from this device or a Mac Pro like they showed yesterday.
Sure it was as it's just a iteration.Or a camera like what it on the iPhone 14.
Huh? Was that sentence suppose to say something?Come to think about it, Apple does still seem to see a lot of iMacs, iPhones, and iCloud services these days.
Outside of your beyond ridiculous comparisons the bottom line is that your suggestions that VR goggles could be the size and weight of a pair of Ray-Bans in half a decade without anything to back up that projection is not just silly, but downright stupid. These aren't stand-alone AR glasses like Google Glass, but offer a fully immersive VR experience. Even if the tech could reasonably shrink to fit everything inside of a pair of lightweight sunglasses in a handful of years (again, it can't), you're still missing the fundamental issue with making a VR headset that is open around the sides, top and bottom as is the case with a pair of Ray-Bans.
I fixed the typo so it was clearer for you to figure out. I was just trying to type a ducking word. -
Even with so many demonstrated use cases, Apple Vision Pro might not yet have a purpose
I’m thinking I’ll probably buy it in about 18 months or so. My main use case will be for watching TV and movies. I’m sure I will also try it for Safari to see how well I like it. Probably for watching YouTube videos as well.
