rogifan_old

About

Username
rogifan_old
Joined
Visits
8
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
572
Badges
1
Posts
725
  • Apple shares open below $100 for first time since 2014

    satchmo said:
    Its herd mentality. No point in speculating. We'll know when Apple reports in a few weeks. But your comment about iPhone 7 just shows how pathetic this is. We've heard next to nothing about iPhone 7, certainly not anything that would point to it being some major change from the 6. So what exactly would the resurgence in the stock be for? If we're to believe these rumors and Apple is cutting orders for the 6S why should we believe people are going to rush out and buy the 7 or that we won't be talking about the same damn thing a year from now with analysts predicting 7 cuts but telling everyone things will get better with the 8.
    I don't think a new iPhone 7 will make a lick of difference. I believe there's a fundamental sea change in the smart phone market. The days of premium $700 phones are numbered and not a 'smart' buy. People are happy to get by with decent $300 phones that do 90% of what an iPhone does. Only your hard core Apple enthusiast will ooh and ahh and make the latest design, a must have upgrade.

    The sky is not falling, but when the iPhone makes up 70% of Apple's revenues, you have to wonder how hard and fast Apple stock can crash.
    But most people aren't paying $700 upfront for a phone. Go to AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile or Sprint and the full price of the phone is in fine print. They're either quoting the monthly installment fee or zero down. The price difference between iPhone and a cheaper Anddroid is maybe $5-$10/mo. I don't think that will stop people from buying an iPhone. 
    potatoleeksoup
  • Apple shares open below $100 for first time since 2014


    Its herd mentality. No point in speculating. We'll know when Apple reports in a few weeks. But your comment about iPhone 7 just shows how pathetic this is. We've heard next to nothing about iPhone 7, certainly not anything that would point to it being some major change from the 6. So what exactly would the resurgence in the stock be for? If we're to believe these rumors and Apple is cutting orders for the 6S why should we believe people are going to rush out and buy the 7 or that we won't be talking about the same damn thing a year from now with analysts predicting 7 cuts but telling everyone things will get better with the 8.
    Apple always gets a nice bump up when they change the shell of the phone. iPhone4, 5, and 6 all had nice unit growth.  The S-models have been hit and miss. 4s was huge, 5s barely had growth, and the 6s will probably have a slight decline. That means even if only iPhone6 users upgrade to the 7 we will see a YoY unit growth over the 6s. But of course there will be switchers from Android and some 5/4 series holdouts who skipped the 6. So I expect a nice 8-10% unit growth for the iPhone7. That should should help the stock reach about $125. In the 7s shows growth then we see $140 in a couple of years.

    With that in mind I'd wait for $80 share price. If taxes isn't a factor I'd even sell shares now at close to $100 and wait for that $80 price in the Spring. Then you can easily get a 50% return by mid 2017.


    The 4s gave us Siri and came at a time that iPhone was really becoming popular (it had just come to Verizon in Feburary of 2011). The 5 and 6 were screen size changes. Whaf is the 7 going to bring that people didn't get with the 6S? I'm skeptical that a new look or something like wireless charging or losing the headphone jack will cause a massive upgrade. If we're going down the path of D&G then I think we have to go all the way. None of this iPhone 7 will be the savior nonsense.
    jackansi
  • Apple shares open below $100 for first time since 2014

    I don't think so. There is just way too much smoke not to have a fire at this point. The March quarter will show an iPhone unit decline. But I would not panic. This is what I see the next few months: stock could go as low as $80 by Spring because of decline of iPhone units in March. But I see the stock resurging on news of the iPhone7 release and big gains in AppleWatch2 units. I expect to close the year at about $125. 
    Its herd mentality. No point in speculating. We'll know when Apple reports in a few weeks. But your comment about iPhone 7 just shows how pathetic this is. We've heard next to nothing about iPhone 7, certainly not anything that would point to it being some major change from the 6. So what exactly would the resurgence in the stock be for? If we're to believe these rumors and Apple is cutting orders for the 6S why should we believe people are going to rush out and buy the 7 or that we won't be talking about the same damn thing a year from now with analysts predicting 7 cuts but telling everyone things will get better with the 8.
    palomine
  • Wells Fargo cuts Apple price target as stock hovers just above $100

    This is a pretty good comment on the state of AAPL IMHO

    http://fortune.com/2016/01/06/apple-wall-street/

    Look at the whole market right now. Stocks are getting killed right now. For example, Chipotle Mexican Grill (which has grown spectacularly over the past several years) is down 40% over just one month (although it should be noted they had some serious food problems recently).
    In the past 3 months Microsoft is up 15%, Google 13%, Amazon 17%, Netflix 9% while Apple is down 9%. 1 year change for Apple: down 5% while Microsoft is up 18%, Google up 50%, Amazon up 114% and Netflix up 153%. The sad thing is Apple stock has been tanking because of these supply chain rumors so you would think bad news is already priced into the stock yet if December is 'meh' and March guidance is light the stock will probably drop another 5-10% after hours. And if the numbers are better than expected it won't do much at all and analysts will explain it away saying the bar was set so low that Apple beating it is no big deal.
    SpamSandwichcornchippalomine
  • Apple CEO Tim Cook earned $10.3M in 2015, Angela Ahrendts highest paid exec

    So basically he's paid a lot of money and Apple doesn't want to disclose it. Still doesn't explain how they get away with it, especially if he's paid more than others, though of course we don't know if that's the case.
    If he's considered a "permanent consultant" (with limitless godlike powers) instead of an officer, that might do it.
    Makes me wonder if that's how they're treating Bob Mansfield. As far as we know he's still working for the company.
    cornchiplatifbp