TurboPGT

rogifan_new said:

2oh1 said:

The fact that the earpods hold 5 hours of charge and the case holds 24 hours of charge, and both can be charged at the same time... that's brilliant. My only worry is about how easy it'll be to lose one of them. At one point during the presentation, Phil showed another product ( a sports earbuds thing?) where the two sides were connected by a short wire. For individual earpieces, that seems smart. I assume a future generation of Earpods will have some sort of GPS so that if you lose one, your iPhone can find it.

I prefer wireless buds that are connected by a wire. 

mac_128 said:

 No mention how these can be used for charging and listening

asdasd said:

9secondkox2 said:

The Apple Watch should be leagues ahead. 

Its not. 

Heres why: it's too complicated. 

I own one. 

I I really like it 

but...

I can can live without it. 

I dont bother with with most features very often because it's annoying. 

Cant say say that about my iMac 5k or iPhone 6 Plus.

watch OS needs a complete rethink. 

You will always get dislikes for any criticism of Apple stuff but this is well said. Some apps, most, are useless except the fitness apps - which is why comparing to Fitbit makes sense. 

cropr said:

NY1822 said:

Wonder if the same people saying they will never buy an Apple Watch will change their minds when you can start your car with one, get into your locked home with one, use one as your wallet.....Oh wait, you can already do all of those 

Exactly that the reason I never want an Apple Watch. If someone steals my current watch, I don't need to be afraid that person break into house, use my car or empty my bank account.
I am still waiting for someone to tell me the real added value of this very expensive gadget:  something that the combination iPhone + Apple Watch has more than iPhone + $50 fitness tracker.  Saving 0.3 seconds by not getting my iPhone out of my pocket is a very limited added value, by no means it amounts to the $300 the Watch costs.