richdatswho

About

Banned
Username
richdatswho
Joined
Visits
16
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
-74
Badges
0
Posts
38
  • Courts predicted to side with law enforcement on fingerprint warrants for Apple's Touch ID

    the easy way to avoid having to deal with this is to just not commit crimes. This has and never will have any impact on my life. I don't do anything in the course of my day that would necessitate law enforcement to ever have to look at the contents of my phone.
    gatorguy
  • FBI lawyer refuses to say whether data extracted from San Bernardino iPhone is 'useful'

    why do people feel entitled to know if what was found on the phone was useful or not? Perhaps sharing that could've been part of the negotiation with Apple but, that didn't happen. You're entitled to the same level of information as any other open and on-going investigation by law enforcement. Why don't you take a trip to your local police station and ask them for all of the information they have on all of their open murder, robbery and home invasion cases and see the response you get... Apple had the choice to work with the FBI behind the scenes and set the parameters around how such a tool would be used, under what circumstances it would be used and who would hold ownership and operation of the tool but they decided to jump on a soapbox and preach against it and the worldwide impact such a tool would have in the wrong hands...Apple forced the FBI's hand and anything that happens from this point on is just as much Apple's fault as it is the FBIs. Apple was stupid for thinking they were going to beat the FBI.
    singularity
  • DOJ confirms successful iPhone data extraction, withdraws encryption case against Apple [u]

    Apple could've worked with the FBI behind the scenes and no one would've been any wiser but, Apple decided not to in an effort to protecting privacy. In doing so they've actually crated a much larger and more dangerous threat to privacy. The FBI owes Apple nothing with regards to sharing how the phone was hacked and why should they? Why would the FBI say "here's exactly how we did it, now go ahead a patch that so we can have this same fight in the future" I hope everyone thanks Mr Cook for creating a much larger and unregulated threat to your privacy.
    OMGlmaosingularity
  • DOJ confirms successful iPhone data extraction, withdraws encryption case against Apple [u]

    volcan said:
    And did they inform Apple of the security vulnerability that was used? Probably not, but they should as it could be an issue of national security.
    They don't have to tell Apple anything...they tried to work with Apple but, Apple decided to make this something nasty in the media...good luck getting the FBI to work with you after a very public bashing
    singularity
  • Microsoft attempt at artificial intelligence becomes Hitler-loving, misogynistic PR disaster

    well, the lesson we learned here is that hate is a learned behavior...
    auxiodysamoriabaconstangroundaboutnowjony0