Urei1620
About
- Username
- Urei1620
- Joined
- Visits
- 154
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 131
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 88
Reactions
-
Government says Apple arguments in encryption case a 'diversion,' presents point-by-point rebuttal
It is unAmerican for the the US Govt to use "terrorism" as a pretext to force an US individual to so something against his will.Natewac said:It's un-American for Apple to not help America in this world war. And if you don't think that we are at war you need to get your head out of your a$$.
-
Government says Apple arguments in encryption case a 'diversion,' presents point-by-point rebuttal
I would have given them an estimate for completing the work of 100 engineers, 8 months, or 288,000 man-hrs for 1 phone at the cost to the US Govt. of $1 billion USD.volcan said:I think Apple screwed up in this chess match with the FBI. They should have said in the beginning, that iOS was so secure that unlocking it was beyond even their own capabilities. There is no backdoor nor is there any way to create one. End of argument.
-
Government says Apple arguments in encryption case a 'diversion,' presents point-by-point rebuttal
if it were for me, I would brick the phone. Ooops, we screwed up, just like you did FBI.jbishop1039 said:They only need 6 people? Fine, take 6 Specialists from random Apple Stores and give em two weeks. See what happens
-
Government says Apple arguments in encryption case a 'diversion,' presents point-by-point rebuttal
The government’s response fills me with rage. I had to stop reading it. But here are some quotes that just made me fume.
“By Apple’s own reckoning, the corporation—which grosses hundreds of billions of dollars a year—would need to set aside as few as six of its 100,000 employees for perhaps as little as two weeks.”
Go back and read Apple’s response to original court order. The work requested would require 10 employees and up to 4 weeks. And the 100,000 are not all engineers. The government thinks that we are a bunch of idiots like they are.
“This burden, which is not unreasonable,”
How do you fknn know? Do you have the source code????
“ is the direct result of Apple’s deliberate marketing decision to engineer its products so that the government cannot search them, even with a warrant.”
Blame it on Apple for competing and constantly innovating. For staying ahead of the game. Or do you want Russia or China to be in the lead on technological innovation? This again is stupid and a reflection of the low IQ level of our courts.
“The Court’s Order is modest.”
How in the fk do you know again? Just because you paraphrase it several times, does it make it true?
“ It applies to a single iPhone, and it allows Apple to decide the least burdensome means of complying. Apple and its amici try to alarm this Court with issues of network security, encryption, back doors, and privacy, invoking larger debates before Congress and in the news media. That is a diversion. Apple desperately wants—desperately needs —this case not to be “about one isolated iPhone.”
At the risk of Comey purgering himself, he did affirm that it was not about 1 phone. That this case would be used as precedence for future cases. Someone is lying and should go to jail for it.
“Apple deliberately raised technological barriers”
It is called INNOVATION. Dumb Govt!
“Apple intentionally and for commercial advantage retains exclusive control over the software that can be used on iPhones, giving it monopoly-like control over the means of distributing software to the phones.”
Again, It is called competition and innovation. Dumb Govt!
“Apple cannot now pretend to be a bystander, watching this investigation from afar.”
Yes it can. This needs to be decided by a higher court like the SCOTUS.
-
California Assembly considers bill to mandate encryption backdoors
This is an unprovoked war started by the state of California against Silicon Valley. Maybe the entire Silicon Valley should relocate. It will be the state's loss. Stupid.
