Madtiger

Anandtech: “The contrast to the best Android SoCs have to offer is extremely stark – both in terms of performance as well as in power efficiency. Apple’s SoCs have better energy efficiency than all recent Android SoCs while having a nearly 2x performance advantage. I wouldn’t be surprised that if we were to normalise for energy used, Apple would have a 3x performance lead.  (3X performance!!!!!  3x!!!  THREE TIMES!!!!)

The Apple A12 is a beast of a SoC. While the A11 already bested the competition in terms of performance and power efficiency, the A12 doubles down on it in this regard, thanks to Apple’s world-class design teams which were able to squeeze out even more out of their CPU microarchitectures. The Vortex CPU’s memory subsystem saw an enormous boost, which grants the A12 a significant performance boost in a lot of workloads. 

On the GPU side, Apple’s measured performance gains are also within the promised figures, and even above that when it comes to sustained performance. The new GPU looks like an iteration on last year’s design, but an added fourth core as well as the important introduction of GPU memory compression are able to increase the performance to new levels.”


Yeah, i love to go there!  Can you keep up? LOL


BTW, since you love Antutu so much, you do realize that Antutu can be cheated on (like Huawei and Samsung have done repeatedly!).  Secondly, Antutu CPU test is pathetically basic...it is far from testing the actual CPU performance.  Per Anandtech: "AnTuTu’s CPU test falls among these as its footprint is also tiny and not testing anything beyond the execution engines and the first level cache hierarchy."

And this is why Antutu is not used by major reviewers...too easily to cheat and the score is not exactly real-world based.  Nice score sure...but SPEC2006 is far better.  So, let's see how S855/8150 can do on SPEC2006.  Until then, YOU JUST GOT OWNED.  

Eximorph said:

Madtiger said:

Eximorph said:

Did you know what you are talking beacus I think you know nothing. 

Antutu bench 
iPhone x max 64 GB 
 7 nm technology 
Ram: 2133 mhz
Api: metal 2 (multicore support)
GPU score 124,528

Galaxy s9+
Snapdragon 845 GPU adreno 630
10 nm technology 
Ram: 1866 mhz
Api: opengl 3.1 (single core)
GPU score 128,091

3D mark
iPhone x max
4231

Galaxy s9+
5099

So like you can see the one a year behind and the one destroyed by an a year old GPU is the apple A12 bionic. I dont know if you but I have both right now in my hands.

On the CPU the A12 bionic is faster but on the GPU dont even dream with that.

Get the right information before post a blog.

AnTuTu is far from being a true benchmark in anything...but here are my scores on my XS: http://www.toyota-4runner.org/3168698-post19.html

3D Mark has a bug in it that causes crashes unless iPhone was warm.  So, the score is off.  In other GPU testings, A12 spanks S845 by a wide margin.  In fact, it is likely that A12 will still lead in GPU over the S855.

there you have if you have any question

https://vernonchan.com/snapdragon-8150-benchmark-beats-kirin-980-apple-a12-bionic/
and if you go with the 45% cpu performca increase and the 20% gpu you will see that those numbers are rigth. my numbers (360,145) based in qualcom performance and my scores.

again dont even go there.

Let’s go there!!  Let’s wait for a REAL device.  

We know that 855 CPU will be 2 years behind Apple. We agree on that. 

GPU...20% faster than 845. We agree.  So let’s see how much faster A12 is over 845. 

To quote Anandtech:

“In terms of sustained performance, the figures quickly reduce after a few minutes and stabilise further down the road. Here, the iPhone XS outperforms the iPhone X by 61%. The Apple A12 is also able to beat the current leader, the Snapdragon 845 inside the OnePlus 6, by 45% in sustained performance.

...the iPhone XS and XS Maxi, thanks to the new A12 SoC, showcase industry leading performance and efficiency, and currently are the best mobile platforms for gaming, period.”


Anything else i need to educate your ignorant arse on?  LOL

gatorguy said:

evilution said:

Seth2015 said:

Wait a minute - wasn't DXOMark a horrible bias terrible site just yesterday? 

It's amazing how its suddenly gained the favour of this community! 

Android users are all about specs and numbers where Apple users are all about usability and real world performance.

??
Where do folks get this stuff? 

Well, you’re right...iPhone is better than Android in both specs/benchmarks AND real life. 

Eximorph said:

Madtiger said:

Eximorph said:

Did you know what you are talking beacus I think you know nothing. 

Antutu bench 
iPhone x max 64 GB 
 7 nm technology 
Ram: 2133 mhz
Api: metal 2 (multicore support)
GPU score 124,528

Galaxy s9+
Snapdragon 845 GPU adreno 630
10 nm technology 
Ram: 1866 mhz
Api: opengl 3.1 (single core)
GPU score 128,091

3D mark
iPhone x max
4231

Galaxy s9+
5099

So like you can see the one a year behind and the one destroyed by an a year old GPU is the apple A12 bionic. I dont know if you but I have both right now in my hands.

On the CPU the A12 bionic is faster but on the GPU dont even dream with that.

Get the right information before post a blog.

AnTuTu is far from being a true benchmark in anything...but here are my scores on my XS: http://www.toyota-4runner.org/3168698-post19.html

3D Mark has a bug in it that causes crashes unless iPhone was warm.  So, the score is off.  In other GPU testings, A12 spanks S845 by a wide margin.  In fact, it is likely that A12 will still lead in GPU over the S855.

Are you crazy 3Dmark never crash on iOS not even in the first day I got the iPhone x max.

antutu on iOS use metal on android open gl es 3.1

A12 Bionic is a 7nm technology vs 10
Memory on the iPhone runs a 2133 mhz vs 1866. 

And how big is the difference between your iPhone probably the 128 GB or more ( a faster storage) and the galaxy s9+ 64 GB??? Just with the 7 nm technology the iPhone is 30% more faster thant the 10 nm technology on the galaxy s9+ and still you do not score a lot more than me. 

And yes 3Dmark is the only Benchmark that support every api out there and the most complete one and you like or not the iPhone lose on the GPU side.

Dude stop lying. iPhone X max??  That must be limited edition!  Lol

Read Anandtech review. 

So, you think that S845 GPU is better than A12?!?!

you think that?  Really?!  

Does Fortnite officially run at 60 FPS on your s9+?  Mine does. 

Eximorph said:

Did you know what you are talking beacus I think you know nothing. 

Antutu bench 
iPhone x max 64 GB 
 7 nm technology 
Ram: 2133 mhz
Api: metal 2 (multicore support)
GPU score 124,528

Galaxy s9+
Snapdragon 845 GPU adreno 630
10 nm technology 
Ram: 1866 mhz
Api: opengl 3.1 (single core)
GPU score 128,091

3D mark
iPhone x max
4231

Galaxy s9+
5099

So like you can see the one a year behind and the one destroyed by an a year old GPU is the apple A12 bionic. I dont know if you but I have both right now in my hands.

On the CPU the A12 bionic is faster but on the GPU dont even dream with that.

Get the right information before post a blog.

AnTuTu is far from being a true benchmark in anything...but here are my scores on my XS: http://www.toyota-4runner.org/3168698-post19.html

3D Mark has a bug in it that causes crashes unless iPhone was warm.  So, the score is off.  In other GPU testings, A12 spanks S845 by a wide margin.  In fact, it is likely that A12 will still lead in GPU over the S855.