Madtiger

About

Username
Madtiger
Joined
Visits
21
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
354
Badges
1
Posts
240
  • Qualcomm's Snapdragon 855 is over a year behind Apple's A12 Bionic, lacks a premium Androi...

    Seth2015 said:
    I see this latest A12 chip is just under 10% faster than the Kirin 980 ... 

    When you speak to some iPhone owners, they speak like it's 5 years ahead of anything on the market and annihilates everything else.

    But 10%, really?
    From the other thread responding YOU:

    You do realize that Kirin 980 CPU multicore score is only 10% less is because it has 2 more BIG cores than iPhone XS A12, right?  I mean you're not THAT stupid, are you?  It actually is much greater than 10% if you factor in that A12 only has 2 BIG cores (and 4 small efficiency cores).  Kirin 980 has 4 BIG cores (A76) and 4 small/efficiency cores.  The difference is HUGE between A12 and Kirin 980.  But why argue...let's get someone smart to comment....

    From Anandtech: "Looking at the wider range of historical SPEC2006 scores, we see the Kirin 980 just losing out to Apple’s A10 (from 2016...TWO YRS AGO) in terms of performance.  No, the Kirin 980 certainly is not able to match Apple’s A12, or even A11 for that matter, and it’s likely this situation won’t change all that much in the next few generations, at least until the Android SoC vendors invest in significantly better and more robust memory subsystems.


    Oh, BTW, Anandtech's CPU testing is with "Performance mode ON" (also known as benchmark cheating mode).  So, even with that, it cannot even beat a 2 years old Apple chip (A10).  THINK about that for a moment there kid.  

    Congratulations, your Mate 20 Pro has the worst performing display on the market for a flagship and its CPU cannot even catch up to a 2016 Apple chip!!
    watto_cobra
  • Apple iPhone XS awarded smartphone camera of the year, Google Pixel 3 runner-up


    Seth2015 said:
    @tmay ;

    I think you're missing the point. I found this site by Googling and stumbled upon a few a articles where the comments where 'iPhone is the best and kills everything in every way! Years ahead of the competition and nothing get's close! I'm so glad I bought one and you bought one!' etc etc etc If you see my first post, it was a fairly polite nudge saying 'hey guys ... none of you have used or want an Android, but be aware they're actually ahead in many categories'. 

    I almost expected to get something that acknowledges that the hardware isn't quite up there, but the phone was preferred due to iOS and ecosystem. Imagine my surprise when that didn't happen and there was a fight over the specs. 

    I'm on multiple technical smartphone sites and the first I've come across where the arguments make zero sense, where everything is ignored and the iPhone is simple the best at everything. It's almost like a cult or something
    Well, kid, you don't know much about this tech stuff...and that is why we make fun of you.  You don't even know your own damn phone!  You talk smack about displays...and yet you did not even realize that your own "flagship" Android phone is a POS and full of BAD compromises.  Horrible inefficient display that drains your battery!  A CPU that is over 2 years behind Apple.

    Now you talk about battery...i was holding back until you made more of a fool of yourself...but your Mate 20 Pro BATTERY LIFE in Anandtech review was FAR BELOW iPhone XS Max despite having such a huge battery!!

    To quote: "The Mate 20 Pro’s result and conclusion is a bit more muted. Its battery life isn’t bad, but falls short of expectations. Here the 4200mAh battery serves as no more than to just compensate for the inefficient display."

    So, your battery is HUGE...yet, in real world, your Mate 20 Pro's battery life is far behind XS Max!!  OUCH!!

    In conclusion, Mate 20 Pro has crappy real world battery life, the worst OLED display ever, and somewhere between 2-3 years behind Apple custom CPU.  In other works, your device is PURE SH!T.

    watto_cobra
  • Apple iPhone XS awarded smartphone camera of the year, Google Pixel 3 runner-up

    Seth2015 said:

    If we look at the benchmarks on the CPU (which aren't even fair), there's actually not even a 10% multi core difference between the A12 and the Mate20Pro. And Apple is going wild about the fastest, most advanced, 5 year ahead of everything SoC?  Very selective of an engineer :/ I'm glad you're not saying the Apple prefers it hat way and the market isn't ready for larger batteries though ;)

    This all get's back to my statement that Apple should maybe focus on something else (ie a battery) rather than a SoC of instead of 10% faster chip which really does nothing in the real world. 
    Why are CPU benchmarks unfair?  Just because your device is bad?  Tell me more.  I explained it on page 3 why Geekbench, Spec2006, etc. are cross-platform.   

    You do realize that Kirin 980 CPU multicore score is only 10% less is because it has 2 more BIG cores than iPhone XS A12, right?  I mean you're not THAT stupid, are you?  It actually is much greater than 10% if you factor in that A12 only has 2 BIG cores (and 4 small efficiency cores).  Kirin 980 has 4 BIG cores (A76) and 4 small/efficiency cores.  The difference is HUGE between A12 and Kirin 980.  But why argue...let's get someone smart to comment....

    From Anandtech: "Looking at the wider range of historical SPEC2006 scores, we see the Kirin 980 just losing out to Apple’s A10 (from 2016...over TWO YRS AGO!!) in terms of performance.  No, the Kirin 980 certainly is not able to match Apple’s A12, or even A11 for that matter, and it’s likely this situation won’t change all that much in the next few generations....”


    Oh, BTW, Anandtech's CPU testing is with "Performance mode ON" (also known as benchmark cheating mode).  So, even with that, it cannot even beat a 2 years old Apple chip (A10).  THINK about that for a moment there kid.  

    Congratulations, your Mate 20 Pro has the worst performing display on the market for a flagship and its CPU cannot even catch up to a 2016 Apple chip!!

    AGAIN, i made you look like a fool.  
    watto_cobra
  • iPhone XS With Dark Mode Has Better Battery Life Than iPhone XR?

    abeldemoz said:
    Hi all,

    I'm making a decision between iPhone XS and iPhone XR for the holidays. The deciding factors in my purchasing decision are one-handed use and battery life as I cannot discern the differences between LCD and OLED unless I look for them. iPhone XS offers better one-handed use whereas iPhone XR offers better battery life... for now.

    It's rumoured that iOS 13 will have a design overhaul and quite possibly dark mode. Dark mode will undoubtedly save battery on the OLED panels, but the question is whether the amount of battery it saves will put the battery life of the iPhone XS on par with the iPhone XR in normal day-to-day use. If so, I'll end up going with the iPhone XS for its one-handed use; otherwise, I'll end up going with the iPhone XR.

    Any help would be appreciated.
    XR has bigger battery and a perfect rectangle battery (not some weird L-shaped thingy on XS).  XR has lower screen resolution (less drag on processor).  XR has less RAM (which indirectly helps with battery life).  Same 7nm processor.

    Dark mode is NOT going to make XS beat XR...forget about it.  Won’t be close.

    BTW, i am a XS owner.
    abeldemoz
  • Qualcomm's Snapdragon 855 is over a year behind Apple's A12 Bionic, lacks a premium Androi...

    “...the US also points more generally to China's National Intelligence Law passed in 2017 that says organisations must "support, co-operate with and collaborate in national intelligence work".

    THIS is the biggest problem.  No matter what Huawei says, it is by law that they MUST cooperate with China’s government in intelligence of their own citizen BUT also foreign bodies.

    Article Seven stipulates that “any organization or citizen shall support, assist, and cooperate with state intelligence work according to law.” 


    Article 11: National intelligence work institutions shall lawfully collect and process relevant intelligences on foreign bodies, organizations and individuals engaged in, or inciting or assisting others to engage in, or domestic bodies, organizations and individuals who collude with foreign bodies, organizations or individuals to engage in harm to the national security and interests of the People’s Republic of China, in order to provide intelligence as a reference and basis and reference for preventing, curbing and punishing the above acts.

    Article 12: National intelligence work institutions may, according to relevant state regulations, establish cooperative relationships with relevant individuals and organizations, and commission them to carry out related work.

    Article 14: National intelligence work institutions, when carrying out intelligence work according to laws, may ask relevant institutions, organizations and citizens to provide necessary support, assistance and cooperation.




    Terrorists connection + China spy-biatch + known history of repeatedly cheating = Huawei.
    watto_cobra