GG1
About
- Username
- GG1
- Joined
- Visits
- 205
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 2,159
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 483
Reactions
-
Qualcomm opposed to Nvidia's $40B takeover of Arm
bloggerblog said:I predict that Apple is already working on their own instruction-set
-
Renault touted as great potential Apple Car partner by analyst
MplsP said:frantisek said:First, not sure why you have two separate article about Renault and Nissan when it is in fact one company.Second, all guys here. Is it our business who will manufacture it? Do you think Apple will not choose parts suppliers and will not control manufacturing and quality? You seem like new into Apple world.Does anything said here have any bearing on what Apple will do?Without a steering wheel and presumably being a self-driving appliance on wheels (Car as a Service), the Apple car wouldn't seem to rely on the assembly partner as much, as I suspect the interior will be minimalist. The assembly partner would have to have experience with BEV's, so Kia, Nissan, and Renault would suffice (as would others). This doesn't seem to be a "halo" sports car, rather more like a smart/connected minivan (connected for the passengers). And Apple would supply or at least develop the key technology bits.Edited for clarity. -
Renault touted as great potential Apple Car partner by analyst
hammeroftruth said:Sure let’s go with Renault.Remember this?
George Costanza didn’t think it was so cool:GEORGE: My father had a car salesman buddy. He was gonna fix him up real nice. Next thing I know, I’m gettin’ dropped of in a Le Car with a fabric sunroof. All the kids are shoutin’ at me, "Hey, Le George! Bonjour, Le George! Let’s stuff Le George in Le Locker!"
-
Hyundai burned by 'Apple Car' negotiation disclosure walk-backs and reframes
MacPro said:This sounds very familiar. Nvidia made the same mistake.
-
Apple nears 'Apple Car' deal with Kia, first model might be fully autonomous enterprise ve...
mark fearing said:Here's my guess. If I get it wrong in three years you can make fun of me. If I get it right, you can still ridicule me. I think Apple with pursue a Car as Service strategy. In urban areas they will offer a 'membership/subscription' where you get a driverless vehicle for so many hours or so many miles a month. Higher cost gets you more access and faster response. Again, in urban areas this is a valuable and cost saving measure for consumers. Cars are a VERY inefficient use of money for those in urban areas where driving 45 miles to work isn't needed. In fact, I think in almost all cases they are an inefficient use of money. Anyway, Apple doesn't want to be Tesla. Not even Tesla wants to be Tesla anymore. There is no upside in selling cars to consumers. But a smart, forward looking, driverless service has potential when paired with a great brand, tied into your portable, wireless devices ETC. In San Francisco, New York, Boston, Los Angeles - this would make sense. I lived in one of those BIG cities and just finding's parking each night sucked not to mention driving to places and trying to valet or find parking. So that's my wild guess from 30,000 feet.