GG1
About
- Username
- GG1
- Joined
- Visits
- 205
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 2,159
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 483
Reactions
-
NYT reporter uses megaphone to decry 'slow death' of 5-year-old iPad mini running iOS 9, a...
Where's his comparison to the Samsung Tab 7?
I still use my Mini (first Retina model) near-daily. The lag between Safari pages is annoying, but it works perfectly otherwise. I know there is no business case to update it, but if Apple can update the SE every few years, maybe they can update the Mini similarly.
-
Apple to open first Austrian store in Vienna on Feb. 24
-
Google closes $1.1B HTC deal, setting up collision course with Apple's iPhone
epicurus said:they should be on a collision course with Samsung, i mean Samsung has been forking Googles Android more and more to build their own OS Tizen if i remember correctly, they all sell android devices if Google is getting into the hardware side then their attack should be Samsung in my opinion
I would think from Google's perspective, Samsung with their own fork would be Google's nightmare.
From Samsung's perspective, Apple are their biggest competitor.
Edit: clarification.
-
Up to three Macs coming with T-series security chips, shift to Apple CPU inevitable
MisterKit said:I am a hardware tech layperson but these T chips and whatever might unfold in the future would seem to eliminate the possibility of a Hackentosh running MacOS at some point. It’s not hard to imagine that is part of Apple’s plan.
https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/203235/apple-details-imac-pros-t2-chip-which-handles-secure-boot-system-management-isp-more/p1
The gist is that the T2 chip is not specifically targeting Hackintoshes at all, although they will be a casualty. Hackintoshes are a rounding error to Apple (to quote Ballmer).
See Ksec's post above (second paragraph).
-
Up to three Macs coming with T-series security chips, shift to Apple CPU inevitable
jameskatt2 said:Unless Apple Buys AMD - which is cheap - then Apple will not be making Intel compatible CPUs for Macs.
When Apple moved to Intel years ago, the Intel compatibility (for Windows) was a selling point (for businesses) for Mac hardware, but I doubt it is as big a selling point NOW vs. THEN. I'm sure Apple know their audience, so maybe Apply may shed Intel compatibility when they think the time is right, even if it leaves a few people stranded.
As more applications move to the cloud, the OS becomes less of a feature/differentiator.