unphocus

FaceID stored on the phone is the mathematical representation of users face, right? Third party don’t have access to it and send it to their own server, right? If that is so, then I see no privacy issue. 

If if an app has given access to the camera and photos, then there’s a chance that a dishonest developer can take your photos, collect data about you, and use it to monetize data or whatever else they could think of (many scary possibilities).

What is like to see happens is that when app needs access to camera, it should be very specific request; for example: “App need access to camera to take photo/video to be stored in your photo album” or something to that extent. The current request is just to generic for app to use camera. 

It’s about damn time. I thought it was quite stupid for not allowing me to switch from a third part to Apple’s own email address. 

I take a time off from work to NOT work. I guess there will be a fraction of their customer who needs it. The question is how many will actually use it? And since most Android users are going for cheaper phones, the picture on this articles doesn’t quite fit the profile of most Samsung customer IMHO. 

This analyst sounds more like a weather guesser the more he talks. 

Apple sales bad in China. Apple sales good in China. All these talks from so called analysts are just talks to promote their own interests. They don’t talk about how much profits those top manufacturers selling in China. I just look at how much money Apple is taking in quarterly while others fight for scraps and be “best seller”