qwerty52

About

Username
qwerty52
Joined
Visits
164
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,145
Badges
1
Posts
384

Reactions

1KLike12Dislike11Informative

  • Apple Car US production reportedly assigned to Hyundai subsidiary Kia

    qwerty52qwerty52
    gatorguy said:
    mike1 said:
    If this is all true, I'm very surprised to learn that Hyundai uses separate plant(s) to manufacture essentially the same car(s).
    I also doubt that Kia would need to "agree to take control of production". They'd be told they are producing the car.
    Hyundai and Kia are separate entities under the Hyundai Motor Group umbrella. It's a bit confusing.
    https://www.lethbridgehyundai.com/blog/2017/03/20/hyundai-history#:~:text=Hyundai Motor Company was founded,vehicle manufacturer in the world.
    It is normal this days. For example under Volkswagen Group you have next to Volkswagen also Audi, Skoda, SEAT, Porsche .....
    watto_cobra

  • Apple Car US production reportedly assigned to Hyundai subsidiary Kia

    qwerty52qwerty52
    The new Foxconn for the next new Apple product is born!
    tmayXedwatto_cobra

  • Bumble warns Apple privacy push could hurt business in IPO filing

    qwerty52qwerty52
    The best thing about Apple's Identifier for Advertisers (IDFA) is, that even before its introduction, has already shown us the companies which 
    are mostly spying on the users.
    As loudly a company is crying and criticizing Apple, as more this company admits that it was spying on us.....(Facebook is only an example for such company)
    superklotonwatto_cobra

  • Incoming Intel CEO demands better chips than 'lifestyle company in Cupertino'

    qwerty52qwerty52
    With avoiding to pronounce Apple’s name, the new Intel’s CEO is just admitting that Apple, which core business is not 
    designing of processors, is much beter in doing that, than Intel, where designing of processors is their core business.
    muthuk_vanalingammattinozRayz2016anantksundaramwatto_cobralarryjwbadmonkseanjkillroyradarthekat

  • Epic Games amplifies antitrust complaint against Apple in the UK

    qwerty52qwerty52
    crowley said:
    qwerty52 said:
    crowley said:
    qwerty52 said:
    gc_uk said:

    buying through apple in-app purchases is much better user experience. I am confident my kids can only "ask to buy" and me or my wife can then approve / reject. Epic games Direct Payment means I have to store my card details on my kids devices and I no longer have control of what they purchase / spend.

    Apples payment system is much easier then any of the other platforms such as Nintendo & Sony Playstation
    That’s fine, you can still purchase through the App Store, but other consumers may want to have the choice to purchase through Epic’s store instead. Why shouldn’t they be allowed to do what they want, when you can make your choice?
    If you want to sell your own potatoes in your own store it is perfectly fine,
    but if you want me to sell your potatoes in my own store, then you have to know that:

    1) You CAN NOT force me to do that if I don’t want 
    2) If I DECIDE to sell your potatoes in my store, it is more than obvious
    that you have to pay me a commission.

    What Epic is trying to achieve in the court, is forcing AppStore to sell their potatoes without paying any commission!

    So, you think this is fair?
    Epic cannot have their own iOS app store.  If they were able to then your first sentence would make sense and we'd have an acceptable solution.  But they can't.

    This is only Epic’s problem! 
    Epic is free to create their own hardware and ecosystem with their own rules, or if not able to do so, to apply to the rules of someone who already did it.
    So simple it is. You can’t eat the cace and still have it whole 
    No need to get excited, I agree with you.  But what you're saying now isn't what you originally said.

    Apologies, if my first post wasn't clear enough.
    watto_cobra