majorsl

About

Banned
Username
majorsl
Joined
Visits
31
Last Active
Roles
unconfirmed, member
Points
188
Badges
0
Posts
119
  • iFixit finds third-party MacBook Pro and iMac Pro repairs still an option, at least for no...

    macxpress said:

    majorsl said:
    I would maybe take iFixit more seriously if they didn’t have a repair kit business where they sell tools to DIYers. Also they seem way more obsessed with Apple than any other consumer electronics manufacturer. Heck they fly people to Australia when a new Apple product launches so they can get a product and do the tear down right away. That’s ridiculous. That’s more about clicks than right to repair or concerns for the environment.
    Well, as someone who has purchased their products over the years for repair and saved myself thousands of dollars, bravo to them.  They are filling a niche that people want, and by the appearance of it, a lot of people want.

    Hey, if you only want Apple-blessed hands to touch your device, that's cool. For some of us, we can do it ourselves, and if the product is out of warranty and not really worth it to repair through the Apple-priests, we really have nothing to lose except a little time.
    Do you think Apple is the only one doing this? Ever try to get a Microsoft Surface repaired (of any model new or old)? Good luck! You have to send it to Microsoft to fix it. I only see more and more companies doing the same thing going forward. Its the same with soldered in RAM and storage. More and more companies are doing the same thing. 

    Quite honestly, the amount of people who do want to repair their own Mac or take it to a non-Apple Certified Service Center is very very very low so this is a non-issue for 99.9999999% of Apple's customer base. 
    Well, maybe it is low, but anyone who uses percentages like that to backup their statement never gets much sway with me.  That's your opinion (and percentage claim), saying a number as a statement of fact doesn't make it so.

    I'm well aware of the problem that is the right to repair.  From car makers to even farm tractors. Corporations have adopted the model of renting (yearly software/storage subscriptions) to you not really owning, because you can't do what you like with your property, of these devices and equipment.

    But hey, like I said, if that's your thing, more power to you.  But it isn't everyone's cup of tea.
    muthuk_vanalingam
  • iFixit finds third-party MacBook Pro and iMac Pro repairs still an option, at least for no...

    I would maybe take iFixit more seriously if they didn’t have a repair kit business where they sell tools to DIYers. Also they seem way more obsessed with Apple than any other consumer electronics manufacturer. Heck they fly people to Australia when a new Apple product launches so they can get a product and do the tear down right away. That’s ridiculous. That’s more about clicks than right to repair or concerns for the environment.
    Well, as someone who has purchased their products over the years for repair and saved myself thousands of dollars, bravo to them.  They are filling a niche that people want, and by the appearance of it, a lot of people want.

    Hey, if you only want Apple-blessed hands to touch your device, that's cool. For some of us, we can do it ourselves, and if the product is out of warranty and not really worth it to repair through the Apple-priests, we really have nothing to lose except a little time.
    mainyehcmuthuk_vanalingam
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 9 blows up in purse, victim sues

    I don’t blame anyone. Wait for details to come out. It maybe a cheap charger.
    But with Note 7 precedent it’s scary.
    This. I always amazed me that people spend 100s of dollars on a phone, Apple or others, then try and find the cheapest charging/cable accessories possible that fry, or sometimes set their device on fire.

    I don't get it.
    ols
  • Netflix's iOS App Store fee avoidance will only give 'modest' revenue boost

    mac_128 said:
    OK, I’ll be the guy who points out, and likely take the abuse, that Apple streaming devices would be a lot less attractive if they did not have access to Netflix. There’s two sides to this issue, and neither is very pretty. Apple wanting to take a cut of a subscription service which does need their platform to succeed is kind of ridiculous. Netflix developed the iOS and tvOS app primarily for the convenience of their Apple customers, not to leverage the Apple platform to increase their visibility. If I couldn’t get Netflix on my Apple TV, I probably wouldn’t have bought one, and gone with a Roku instead, which is how I handled Amazon Prime (literally switching boxes to watch Prime content, and some others). We’ve already seen this play out with Amazon pulling the Apple TV from their website because it didn’t offer a Prime App, which was entirely up to them to provide or not, likely over similar issues, which is why we likely now have an Prime app that doesn’t allow in app purchases. Fortunately, this is not a major issue for me.  Going to the Amazon app with one click purchasing is no more difficult than buying it in app.
    Yes, and if they were forced to, Netflix and Amazon could just optimize streaming on a web browser for iOS.  Of course, there are those who will say Apple should get a cut for anything that is streamed to their device be it via an app or a web browser because, you know, Apple.
    mac_128claire1hammeroftruth
  • Apple's T2 chip may be behind small number of crashes in iMac Pro, new MacBook Pro

    I'm amused by the support staff suggestions. It reminds me of those medication ads that cure something, then the guy comes on at the end and lists all the side effects.

    Didn't Scotty say, "the more they overthink the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain"?
    netmagedysamoria