Koll3man

anantksundaram said:

Clueless. 

But it’s a free country, so knock yourself out. 

ericthehalfbee said:

And here's a great one just for you. This shows the throttling of various devices and indeed the 835 does throttle very little. However, you're missing the point. These are smartphones, not laptops or desktops. Sustained performance isn't nearly as critical as burst performance and race-to-sleep.

lowededwookie said:

Yeah except for the fact that the iPhone 7 was two years ago. Do you seriously believe that Intel has sat on its butt for that time?

In my mind Qualcomm modems suck because I’ve had to deal with them on PCs and their drivers sucked, their signal sucked, and... well they just made my life hell getting them to do basic stuff.

Sure Intel might not be good now but look what happened when Apple got in bed with them and released the Intel Macs. Intel got it right with the Core series processors and ended up blowing away AMD who at the time had the better processors. Now Apple has a vested interest in getting Intel up to spec so the modems today will be far better than the brand new modems Intel had two years ago.

Sure Intel might not be good now but look what happened when Apple got in bed with them and released the Intel Macs

Be serious man, Qualcomm is preparing to announce their first 5G Modem with the Snapdragon 855 at the end of 2018. Intel's hasn't even matched the modem in the Snapdragon 835.

racerhomie3 said:

Koll3man said:

nunzy said:

Bye bye, Qualcomm. Maybe suing Apple was a bad idea, eh?

Yeah big win for Apple, not so much for future iPhone users but who cares Qualcomm makes the best mobile phone modems? These are just unimportant details.

Keep telling yourself that. No one cares. Ooh I cannot get ‘that extra 5megabit’ .
Most people don’t also buy the iPhone ‘because FaceID is 3 years ahead , or A9 uses NVMe SSD controller 

Rayz2016 said:

ascii said:

I blame Intel for the lack of Mac updates. I have been a fan of chipzilla for a while now, but lately they've been behaving very badly. They've gone from simply producing slow updates to outright misleading people (with the 28-core CPU nonsense at Computex). 

And watch their Computex presenation as well, was there ever such a collection of improperly prepared, condescending, fake ass douches in one presentation? The sooner Mac moves to AMD x64 or ARM the better.

A fair point, but it's not quite as simple as that. As folk love to point out, Intel has made some small incremental improvements over the years of stagnation, but Apple hasn't always picked them up.

The root of the problem is that ninety per cent of the Wintel machines out there are pretty much the same. You can even find machines with identical cases, parts and specs sold by different third-party resellers. Windows box builders rarely offer anything unique across their offerings, but in many ways this lack of any real differentiation is an advantage: it means that testing new configurations is easy.

Because Apple's OS doesn't conform to the WinTel spec (the spec that describes how hardware drivers interact with the Windows plumbing) then all that testing has to be done by Apple, and they also need to do all the testing and development of the drivers to make Bootcamp work with their hardware (bear in mind the increasing number of components that are going into Apple kit that is designed and built by Apple itself).

So this is probably why Apple doesn't jump on every tiny spec bump to the Intel chips; it wouldn't be cost effective for the Mac unit.

That's what they would tell you if you ask. The main reason is a bit more simple.

If a PC user discovers that his machine has a better spec a week after he bought it, he'll just say, "Oh well, I had to jump sometime" and get on with his life.

The kind of Mac user (especially round here) who complains that Apple doesn't update often enough, is most probably the same sort of Mac user who will complain if Apple updates at the same rate that Intel makes incremental improvements. This kind of Mac user doesn't like to feel that his Mac is out-of-date less than a year after he bought it. In fact, he's the probably the sort of Mac user who will come here and demand a class action because Apple has "obsoleted" his machine when it less than a year old.