Seth2015

@tmay ... no that's not it.

I think perhaps we're the only two that have actually used both phones?
I mean with all respect - you haven't even seen one in real life?

So we have a bunch of unknowledgable iPhone fans that don't know anything about the competition, trying their hardest to argue a point which has already been proven over and over again. 

@tmay People use different devices. I have both an iPhone X (standby phone every 2 weeks) and Huawei. You want a real world opinion? You can't see the difference in speed in actual using the phones. There's no jitter or judder, despite what Strangedays thinks he knows.

Anyhow - but based on the comments here slating Androids, it'd be interesting to see which the people have used (or even read about;). There's a great world out there of mobile phones! @Madtiger wasn't even aware that Huawei phones be bought anywhere in the world - yet they're the second largest manufacture behind Samsung? So, it's very interesting how he (and others) can be that opinionated on something he has zero idea about.  

A cross platform benchmark isn't dead accurate. I've already told you why and given an example - unsure why you're missing it?

My i5 at home, I can install Linux and run a benchmark - let's say I get 12,000 little numbers on the screen. I now install Windows 10 on the same chip and get a 10,000. So for those that are slightly slower here (I'm looking at your madtiger) this is the same chip with a different result depending on the OS layer. 

iOS is really efficient OS. It doesn't have the extra bloatware that Android has once a manufacture has got hold of it and put on their own skin. A fair comment would be the chip + OS is delivery these awesome figures ... but to pretend the A11 streets ahead of the Kirin 780 is just silly bias on your side. It really is the combination of the two

And lastly, numbers on the screen aren't going to tell you the real world user performance. Yes - the iPhone s quick and smooth ... but my Mate 20 Pro is just the same. I've had zero issues with regards to speed ... but I guess I place more emphasis on real world than numbers on the screen ?  

@StrangeDays Your argument about the low resolution screen is something that every Apple users has said from 2007.

So basically - any lower than 1,792 x 828 and you'll see the difference?
And any higher, you'll put added strain on the battery (which already battles) and GPU?
So Apple called it, again? Just right? Such an amazing company, this

But next year when they up this resolution, you'll be sitting in the front row of the Keynote and think 'revolutionary!' ...

PS We're used to this loop after 10+ years. Apple launches something late and while they don't have it, none of their users want it ... until Apple tells them they do.

That's a better argument ... Thanks strangedays.

You don't think maybe they could spend some money on a better? Maybe something that lasts a little longer? iPhone batteries die pretty early in in any very tests. 

On the screen - from the outside, it looks like iPhone XR is running a screen from 2013. It can't do FullHD - you reckon this is all the eye can see? There is no need for anything higher?