hackintoisier

About

Username
hackintoisier
Joined
Visits
47
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
400
Badges
0
Posts
87

Reactions

165Like0Dislike47Informative

  • Studio Display includes as much storage as iPad, iPhone 11

    hackintoisierhackintoisier
    Hack it so it has airplay and/or tvOS functionality. 
    watto_cobra

  • iPad Air 5 benchmarks show identical performance to 11-inch iPad Pro

    hackintoisierhackintoisier
    9secondkox2 said:
    Curious. What is the point of buying the pro at this point? 

    I have a 1st gen iPad Pro. Still works flawlessly. 

    But thinking of getting the m1 version. 

    So what’s the difference between the latest Pro and Air? 
    If you’re used to Pro motion you will regret going backwards to 60 Hz. If you have thunderbolt devices that you use with your iPad you will regret opting for usb-c 10 gbps. Go pro or go home is my advice. 
    byronlfastasleepwatto_cobra

  • iPhone 14 may still use A15, Pro models move to A16 says Ming-Chi Kuo

    hackintoisierhackintoisier
    That account is probably apple behind the scenes trolling the community. 
    muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra

  • Compared: New 2022 iPad Air vs 2020 iPad Air

    hackintoisierhackintoisier
     M1 but no thunderbolt? 
    williamlondonwatto_cobra

  • Leaked plan shows Intel will try to be more efficient than M1 Max by late 2023

    hackintoisierhackintoisier
    jcs2305 said:
    Nowhere does the leaked slide say Intel is targeting m1 max.  Alder lake already beats m1 max at many tasks. With arrow lake-p, Intel is targeting whatever chip apple will have in-market in late 2023/early 2024. 

    What’s not mentioned in the slide is arrow lake-H. Intel’s p-series are it’s low power series. Intel’s h series are it’s high end mobile chips that offer desktop class performance. 

    If an intel low power p-series chip beats apple m2 max or m3 max, then the h series will have even more performance still. At a higher wattage of course.  

    My take: Arrow lake-p seems to be designed to match a similar performance per watt as apple’s m series chips. Arrow lake-h seems to be designed to leave apple in the dust. But only time will tell. The benefactor of this competition will be us, the consumer. 

    Intel has already claimed to be producing processors that exceed the performance of Apple's M1 Max. However, the difference is within a margin of error while at the same time, Intel's processors require dramatically more power.


    Now the company is reportedly aiming at a new processor that will beat Apple's 2021 chips by early 2024 at the latest.


    What are you talking about?

    The introduction of the article states: “ A presentation slide claiming to show Intel's projected future roadmap includes plan for Arrow Lake processor to outperform Apple's M1 Max by late 2023 or early 2024.” 

    However the leaked intel slide states: ARL-P is targeting Apple 14 premium inch designs. Nowhere does the intel slide claim that intel is targeting the 2021 m1 max with a 2023/24 product. 

    The implication of the article is that intel is only hoping to catch up to apple’s m1 max in 2023… but this is a spurious claim as alder lake already beats m1 max at many tasks (albeit at a higher power consumption). Therefore, the article is wrong. 

    Arrow lake follows meteor lake, and it will destroy alder lake, and thus m1 max. Intel is clearly targeting arrow lake towards whatever m-series chip apple will have on the market in 2023-24. 
    williamlondonbeowulfschmidt