ITGUYINSD
About
- Username
- ITGUYINSD
- Joined
- Visits
- 122
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,665
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 584
Reactions
-
Check out the 117 new emoji coming to Apple platforms later this year
fastasleep said:ITGUYINSD said:I just don't get the point of things like a screwdriver or other objects. Can't people just type "screwdriver" faster than searching through 12000 emoji's for the screwdriver emoji?
As it is now, I have a hard enough time finding the facial or hand expression I want, let along having to sift through emojis for every word in the dictionary. -
Apple gets FCC approval for Mac Pro tower, and rack-mount version
-
T-Mobile 5G service launches across US, minus high-speed mmWave
yuck9 said:curtis hannah said:T-Mobile is giving speed increases like At&t has done. Though they appear to use newer modems that are only going to be available on any mainstream phones out next year.
I'd like to see a 4GLTE comparison (of each carrier) with 5GE, T-Mobile 5G, and Verizon 5G before calling this out as unimportant, as its to my understanding speeds are supposed to jump from 50Mbps, 100Mbps,250Mbps,1Gbps between the 3 types, and if thats the case people are seeing at least noticeably higher speeds years before MM wave towers make it to any rural areas, no matter what carrier it is.
I found on Tom's Guide this information:
"When I tested AT&T's 5G network in Las Vegas, I hit 900 Mbps over 5G. LTE can't compare, but I clocked over 200 Mbps on an iPhone running on AT&T's 5G E (advanced LTE) network. That's exponentially better than AT&T's existing LTE network, which averaged download speeds of 32.91 Mbps earlier this year." -
Apple's brawny 5G iPhone family will require larger, pricey motherboards
I've yet to be convinced that this whole "5G thing" isn't really a fleecing of consumers because carriers (and phone manufacturers) have run out of ways to innovate and need a revenue stream in the coming years.
It's going to be spotty coverage. It doesn't penetrate buildings well. Short distance. And, most of all, who needs that sort of speed on a phone? You're not going to watch a 2 hour movie any faster! Not to say some people won't have some reason to validate ridiculously fast speeds on a phone, but for 99% of us, isn't the existing 4GLTE system plenty fast? If the carriers just worked on filling in the dead spots for that, who needs 5G? The other day, on AT&T, I was getting 100 down/50 up. Why would I need anything faster on my iPhone?
And now, 5G devices will be more expensive, bigger, hotter, etc. Not convinced.
-
Compared: The 2019 Amazon Fire HD 10 versus the 10.2-inch 7th gen iPad
fasterquieter said:I bought the previous version for $99. I was very pleased with myself, as I'd have a tablet to take traveling without having to worry about losing it. Traveling with my expensive iPad Pro made me very nervous. Turns out is was just a waste of $99. The volume was too low, the screen had a terrible light leak that drew my eye away from any movie I was trying to watch. It was too dim to see in a bright room. It was painfully slow. Almost felt broken sometimes waiting for the home screen icons to appear. I hated it so much.
The article states that if you don't have enough money then you don't have a choice between this and the iPad. This is true, but I think a third option is to put the extra $150 toward a better phone. I found the Kindle device to be so horrible to use, I used my phone instead. Maybe the faster chip will make this revision worth it, but I doubt it.
Each device has a purpose and I do't expect my $79 Fire HD 10 to be as beautiful and lightning fast and buttery smooth as my $1000 iPad Pro. But I can stick a 200GB SD card in the Fire tablet and load it up with movies or use the PLEX client app and it works just fine.