Mikeydangerous

It feels crazy that nowhere in this comparison did you mention which camera got closer to what the scene looked like in real life. That's a far more important metric than just comparing one against the other. Personal preference is going to factor a ton when just comparing one to the other, but I don't care about the style of each camera. I want to know which one was closer to capturing reality. I have a sneaking suspicion that because of the way the iPhone saturates colors and makes things generally look brighter (which people subjectively tend to like better) that the Pixel was closer to reality for the most part.

Please stop trying to claim Apple TV+ is a competitor to any studio like Disney or HBO. Apple TV+ is competing with networks like CBS All access at best.

A few big problems with this argument: just because Apple's cameras are a big selling feature on the iPhone doesn't mean that A) those locked into the Apple ecosystem would leave for a better camera, B.) That having a great camera will automatically draw lots of sales (that's more a product of marketing as evidence by Samsung selling a ton with a great camera, but Google (arguably the best camera) not selling much), and C) That Apple even still has a "mobile imaging lead" as the HL claims. iPhones take the best video, Pixels take the best photos, but none of that even matters once your social network of choice compresses the hell out of the file.