teixeiramelo

In response to your points, I've labelled your paragraphs and my responses with the same numbers. I find this approach to be clarifying.

A) It's entirely possible that some jurisdiction like the EU will demand side loading, which will reduce or eliminate Apple's profits. But you've worded it wrong: they can't force Apple to do anything because they can't force Apple to do any business at all in their country. All they can do is "prohibit" Apple from not permitting side loading. And Apple could comply with that prohibition by not selling anything in the EU, or most likely they could comply by just not selling apps to any user in the EU. It's a valid response that Apple could take, but people always ignore this valid response because they want Apple to lose.

1) Apple already blocks apps that promote tobacco, or contain porn, or many other things. Apple doesn't agree with those apps. I notice you aren't complaining about that. Why aren't you complaining? Do you or do you not agree with the fact that Apple can and does block apps that it doesn't agree with. Here's an interesting one: Apple blocks all apps that tell the time on watchOS. Do you think that's fair? Should the courts overturn that rule?

2) Apple can simply block any developer in direct competition with them. As I stated in the previous paragraph, they already block any app that tells the time on watchOS, and nobody complains about that. Apple decided that they want the monopoly on time apps on watchOS. but they have graciously allowed nearly every other kind of app onto watchOS (excluding tobacco, porn, etc.) So if they can legally block, then they can certainly legally charge them a fee. But if for some reason they aren't allowed to charge a fee, they should just block them because they are in direct competition with them, just like watch apps on watchOS.

3) Since you aren't explaining what accounting tricks you are concerned about, I will ignore you. But I'll bet you don't pay any more taxes than you have to, and your accountant probably uses smart accounting tricks to get your taxes reduced. Since when is being "smart" unfair? 

4) You obviously hate big companies, for the sole reason that they are big and powerful. They got rid of big companies in 1918 in Russia, and that didn't work out very well for them. Or did it, from your perspective? Please answer that.

CloudTalkin said:

That's a wasted update regarding game streaming.  This gets us no closer to streaming Game services than we were before the update.  Individual games being on the App Store is just individual games on the App Store.  Who in hell is downloading a 50GB to over 100GB game to an iOS device?  The whole point of streaming is to remove the hardware limitations and just get the game to the customer.  The good folks at Apple aren't stupid and they know this update for streaming apps is nothing more than theater.