mclain89
About
- Username
- mclain89
- Joined
- Visits
- 1
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 2
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 2
Reactions
-
Head EU antitrust regulator wants Apple to allow alternate app stores
i agree she should go and Fkkkk herself.She does not care for open and competition and all that crap, she just wants to provoke Apple and hope Apple pulls out of the EU. All she and her circles want is to make perhaps the greatest American company, less relevant in the world. Apple should not pull out of the EU, -
Epic argues Apple has 'no rights to the fruits' of its labor in 'Fortnite' filing
davidw said:ITGUYINSD said:said:seanismorris said:I think Apple’s fees are high, but it’s difficult to sympathize with Epic.
Basically Epic doesn't want to be subsidizing the small developer (who include their competitors) any more. Understandable. But every one of the 200 million socialists in the US should be outraged at Epic.
The cost of starting a business isn't $99 so it's appropriate for a free app. I think $1000 is a great starting point to get the dev tools and marketing and distribution. The payment system should be the devs choice -- stick with App Store (30%) or go it alone (3% by most CC systems). Either way, Apple got their $1000 to allow you to market your app on their store, at least until there are other options to market and distribute your app outside the App Store. The current investigations against Apple for being a monopoly will tell us soon if that is an option.
Developers that don't want to pay Apple 30% of sales would have to set up and maintain their own secure server, to accept and process CC or PayPal payments. Or maybe there are companies that offer this kind of service. I can't imagine that it's not going to cost anything for a developer to set up their own payment system. What? Are they going to only accept checks in the mail?
Then there's the logistics of how to you activate the app that a customer paid for, from outside of the Apple App Store. The app has to be available in the Apple App Store. There's no other way for your customers to get an iOS app into their iDevice. Will all the downloads use the same password? If so, then what prevents a customer from sharing the password with others? Which means that each download must have it's own serial number and unique password, which must be emailed to the customer after payment. How much time is that going to add to developing an app and the time it takes to process a payment and email the unique password?
What about refunds? Or what happens if the payment don't go through? What if customers don't want to use a CC or don't have one or don't want to give their CC info to a developer for a $1.99 purchase? Will the developer offer gift cards, like with Apple iTunes? Time is not free, if you're a developer trying to make money selling software.
Will the customer have to pay for each download of the same app, for all their iDevices? If not, then it will require providing several passwords to the paying customers that will be using the same purchased app on more than one iDevices. What if a customer iDevice crashes and is reset to factory? What if a paying customer buy a new iDevice? How much time will the developer have to spend to provide customers that already paid for an app months or years ago, to have it working again after a factory reset or want to have it on another iDevice they already own or purchased later or transferred to a new iDevice that replaces their old one, if each download requires a unique password to activate? Apple's 30% takes care of all of this with iTunes.
It might only cost big developers like Epic, Spotify or MS just 3% to process payments for apps sales because they already have a secure payment system in place that most of their customers trust. But it's going to cost the average small and medium size developers way more than just 3% of sales. I'm willing to bet that for those developers that don't already have a payment system in place and must use Apple's iTunes, 30% of sales is a bargain. Even if one don't include the benefit of having access to Apple customers on their iOS platform.
It's a joke that so many people think that Apple's 30% cut only goes toward covering the 3% that is paid to the CC companies. And even more of a joke to think that if a developer were allowed to set up their own payment system, they will make 27% more on each sale, after covering the 3% CC transaction fee. If anything, most developers will lose sales because many potential customers are not going to trust unknown developers websites, with their CC info, for a one time purchase that will probably be less than $5.
This is the best explanation I have ever read on this topic. I wish Apple lawyers, or maybe the appointed judge on the case, would be reading this. No need to read further. Apple is clearly on the right side of history here, but your fine elaboration nailed it!