brianjo

About

Username
brianjo
Joined
Visits
35
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
405
Badges
1
Posts
68
  • macOS Sonoma beta review: Few major updates, but very welcome

    Sharing passwords (especially in a business environment) is a major security issue. It's amazing that they are making that EASIER.

    Of course, there are plenty of websites that haven't taken the simple step of letting businesses create business accounts that can have multiple sub users each with their own login, so I see why people still do it.  Still a major problem in many ways!
    williamlondonforgot usernameFileMakerFeller
  • Family hit with $3,100 App Store bill after kid goes on Roblox spending spree

    A 10-year-old child spent over $3000 on Roblox via the family iPad, charges applied after the child changed the account password.

    This is a problem with iOS. It's set up to be a single use device, yet people purchase them as family devices. This encourages, if not requires sharing AppleIDs and passwords instead of the proper method of each user having their own ID and password.

    Granted, when using a shared device, I typically recommend creating a separate 'family' AppleID that has all of the restrictions in place that requires adult approval for purchases, etc.  However, since Apple doesn't have a system in place for family use of an iPad, this puts it more on the onus of the family to come up with this sort of solution. It also means that anyone with access to the iPad can change the password on that AppleID on that pad, including the 10 year old using it.

    The AppleTV used to be the same problem. Recently, they've added family features into the device. It's about time that the iPad got the same treatment.

    For family AppleIDs, Apple really should let families set things up they way they do with business and school accounts.  The parents then could have control of the children AppleIDs, being able to reset passwords, lock devices, etc.
    williamlondonwatto_cobramuthuk_vanalingamravnorodom
  • Fraudsters beat App Store vetting by swapping out app data

    When apps are merely shells wrapped around websites to show content and layout, they are not much different than just going to that website vs using the app.  

    Unless Apple changes the rules and says all layout and functionality must be contained WITHIN the app, this will be impossible to stop, as websites are not under the control of Apple.  Anyone at any time could take a seemingly harmless website and turn it into an evil monster that intends to do you harm.
    DAalsethlolliverwatto_cobraAlex1N
  • Here's why you don't put an AirTag on your dog's collar

    The problem is not the airtags. The problem is the unsafe airtag mounting systems like the one shown.  If you have an airtag that securely mounts inside the collar, all of the issues listed go away.  And if an airtag is useless to find a pet, it's also useless to find other non-living objects as well.
    bonobobtimpetushealthy_scratchFileMakerFellerravnorodomlolliverAlex1NCluntBaby92applguyRichD
  • Elon Musk orders Twitter to charge $20/month for verification

    Not everyone needs verification.  Verification is for those that are celebrities, politicians, etc, where it's likely that others would create accounts to pretend to be them.  For these people, $20/month is very little money.

    What this does is make it a financial burden to scam the verification system for someone that figured out how to trick the verification process.  Now that 'fake' account you create requires a payment which then creates more of a paper trail as to who is behind the fake account.

    Makes total sense.
    williamhJapheybaconstanganonconformistwatto_cobra