sandyman18

charlesn said:

macxpress said:

The 24" iMac could be updated just to keep it current. It's getting a little long in the tooth. 

It could be updated with an M2 just for marketing purposes--as we now know, the basic M2 is not significantly faster than the M1--but otherwise, what do you think makes it "long in the tooth?" There hasn't been much in the way of advancements since it debuted as an all-new model/design of iMac just a little over 18 months ago. 

The M1 iMac was underpowered at launch.  Previously, the smaller iMac had the same chip and graphics offerings as the Macbook Pro.  So it should come with a Pro and Max chip - but does not.  Though the M1 is superior to any previous intel chip from a computing standpoint, the current iMac cannot match a fully speced 21.5" version on graphics.

At this point, there is a huge gap in Apple's desktop offerings between the most capable iMac and the base Studio/Studio Display.  The best iMac is an M1 with 8 GPU cores and 16 gigs of RAM, which goes for $1,899.  The base Studio/Studio Display has an M1 Max with 24 GPU cores and 32 gigs of RAM, fetching around $3,900 with a mouse and keyboard.  If Apple put the M2 in the iMac, at least you could get two more graphics cores and 8 more gigs of RAM.  Ideally, I would like a 24" with a Pro chip and 32 gigs of RAM!

The lack of a better chip option for the 24" iMac is a mystery.  A maxed-out current model iMac does not match the graphics of a maxed-out 21.5-incher from the previous generation.  Please Apple, just offer an M1 or M2 Pro (when they come out) in the 24" iMac!

Or a 24” iMac Pro?

Wish Apple would offer a pro version of the 24”. The best M1 spec still does not match the graphics of the previous high end 21” model.